This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
Cc: Stephane Hockenhull <shockenhull at niceberg dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:48:01 -0500
Subject: Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
References: <200711261333.54555.shockenhull@niceberg.com> <20071126184035.GE17815@synopsys.com> <20071126190130.GA12875@caradoc.them.org> <200711261602.48771.shockenhull@niceberg.com> <20071127002935.GI17815@synopsys.com>

On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:29:35PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> But why are you using -fleading-underscore?

It's the default for a lot of targets.  I'd still like to see a
concrete example of the problem...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull

References:
- why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Stephane Hockenhull
- Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]