This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC


On Nov 24, 2007 9:19 PM, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2007, Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> > Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> And then, despite the consensus that GCC must not generate different
> >> code with and without -g, the patch that fixes one such regression has
> >> been lingering for months, and the patch that introduced the
> >> regression hasn't been reverted either.
>
> > Pointers?
>
> Regression introduced here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01745.html
>
> first reported here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00127.html
>
> last proposed patch here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00608.html

Well - it's a workaround for a bug that's elsewhere.  Generated code
shouldn't change
if we allocate extra DECL_UIDs, but only possibly if we change
DECL_UID ordering.
(If that is the problem, as I remember your analysis)

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]