This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10


On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 06:59:03PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > No, that's not correct.  Configuring with --disable-checking is
> > perfectly reasonable in some circumstances.  For instance, when testing
> > the effect of a patch without the assertion noise.
> 
> Not sure what you call the "assertion noise", (reasonable) assertions in a 
> compiler are a feature, --disable-checking should not be advertised since
> all the assertions are now predicated on at least --enabled-checking=release.
> 
> That being said, if there is a bug, I agree that we should try and fix it.
> 

I opened a bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34144

Revision 130005

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-11/msg00197.html

is the cause.

H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]