This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>, Art Haas <ahaas at impactweather dot com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:08:59 -0500
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10
References: <200711092206.lA9M63YC005554@impdell3.impactweather.com> <4734E514.2070400@pop.agri.ch> <4348dea50711170541q717c09c9h20a33efad8bc85d0@mail.gmail.com> <200711171516.44413.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On 11/17/07 09:16, Eric Botcazou wrote:

I'm still seeing the same failure on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, is this
going to get fixed?
You're not supposed to configure the compiler with --disable-checking as this disables the internal assertions, use --enable-checking=release instead.

No, that's not correct. Configuring with --disable-checking is perfectly reasonable in some circumstances. For instance, when testing the effect of a patch without the assertion noise.

--disable-checking will also uncover heisenbugs masked by asserts, as it seems to be this case.

Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10
  - From: Art Haas
- Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]