This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Limits of stage3 changes

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:16:50 -0500
Subject: Re: Limits of stage3 changes
References: <571f6b510711161443r4727c091h1f6f211b0a7c119a@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0711180117250.20293@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>

>>>>> Kaveh R GHAZI writes:

Kaveh> I think the answer is "maybe".  In the past we have counted compile-time
Kaveh> savings as appropriate for stage3 regression fixes.  However IMHO you
Kaveh> would need to provide some measurement of the improvements (memory saved,
Kaveh> speed timings) so the RM and perhaps middle-end maintainers can weigh the
Kaveh> risk vs benefit and make an informed decision.

Kaveh,

	The time savings fall out of the algorithm improvements.

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Limits of stage3 changes
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

References:
- Limits of stage3 changes
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Limits of stage3 changes
  - From: Kaveh R. GHAZI

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]