This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, Emmanuel Fleury <fleury at labri dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:28:22 -0500
Subject: Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?
References: <47317545.2070708@labri.fr> <20071107164101.GB4550@synopsys.com> <m37ikuroo2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey wrote:

First, aren't we already in this situation?  There are at least 2
compilers out there that re-use parts of GCC by serializing trees and
then reading them into a different back end.


It's not obvious to me that this is consistent with the GPL ..
interesting issue ...

Second, how does the LTO project avoid this same worry?

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?
  - From: Chris Lattner
- Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?
  - From: Florian Weimer

References:
- Progress on GCC plugins ?
  - From: Emmanuel Fleury
- Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: Progress on GCC plugins ?
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]