This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: strict aliasing


On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:15:55AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> > Ah, I see. So turning [strict aliasing] off isn't really all that bad
> > for optimisation.
> 
> It depends on the processor.  For an in-order processor with a deep
> pipeline (e.g., Itanium, but there are others), the ability to reorder
> loads and stores is very important to permit scheduling flexibility.
> Strict aliasing reportedly makes a difference for x86, but I don't
> think it makes a huge difference.

It also depends on the input: for scientific codes that process both
integer and real data, strict aliasing could make a large difference
on any processor.




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]