This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gomp slowness

From: Olivier Galibert <galibert at pobox dot com>
To: skaller <skaller at users dot sourceforge dot net>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Gary Funck <gary at intrepid dot com>, Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 20:00:15 +0100
Subject: Re: gomp slowness
References: <1192640402.10798.11.camel@rosella.wigram> <20071017170948.GA25883@synopsys.com> <1192671772.25512.36.camel@rosella.wigram> <20071102040200.GA25827@intrepid.com> <1193993311.5893.33.camel@rosella.wigram> <m3y7dgognu.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <20071102144630.GA27150@caradoc.them.org> <1194021531.5838.19.camel@rosella.wigram>

On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 03:38:51AM +1100, skaller wrote:
> My argument is basically: there is no need for any such
> feature in a well written program. Each thread already has
> its own local stack. Global variables should not be used
> in the first place (except for signals etc where
> there is no choice).

And for libraries where there is no choice.  Happens rather often.

  OG.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gomp slowness
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: gomp slowness
  - From: skaller

References:
- Re: gomp slowness
  - From: Gary Funck
- Re: gomp slowness
  - From: skaller
- Re: gomp slowness
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gomp slowness
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: gomp slowness
  - From: skaller

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]