gcc archive
date index for November, 2007

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

November 30, 2007
22:48 gcc-4.3-20071130 is now available gccadmin
22:24 Re: volatile and R/M/W operations Richard Kenner
22:19 volatile and R/M/W operations Samuel Tardieu
22:18 Re: gnat1 huge time Eric Botcazou
22:14 Re: gnat1 huge time Eric Botcazou
22:06 Re: gnat1 huge time Krister Walfridsson
21:17 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
21:10 Re: gnat1 huge time Joel Sherrill
21:10 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
20:52 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
19:45 Re: gnat1 huge time Eric Botcazou
19:37 Re: gnat1 huge time Joel Sherrill
19:13 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES DJ Delorie
19:05 Re: GNAT SVN trunk on PowerPC and SPARC Eric Botcazou
19:00 Re: gnat1 huge time Eric Botcazou
18:59 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
18:25 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
18:17 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:11 Re: Describing commercial support on our website Joe Buck
18:03 Re: Describing commercial support on our website David Daney
17:52 Re: Describing commercial support on our website Joe Buck
17:00 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:43 Re: GNAT SVN trunk on PowerPC and SPARC Joel Sherrill
16:27 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:11 Re: GNAT SVN trunk on PowerPC and SPARC Joel Sherrill
16:02 Re: gnat1 huge time Joel Sherrill
14:53 Re: Describing commercial support on our website Manuel López-Ibáñez
08:45 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Richard Sandiford
07:46 Re: GNAT SVN trunk on PowerPC and SPARC Eric Botcazou
04:16 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
02:21 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
00:32 Re: gnat1 huge time Krister Walfridsson

November 29, 2007
23:59 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Joseph S. Myers
23:33 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. Joe Buck
23:33 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. Michael Meissner
23:28 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. Michael Meissner
23:27 Re: GNAT SVN trunk on PowerPC and SPARC Joel Sherrill
23:18 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. Joe Buck
23:17 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. Andreas Schwab
23:05 Re: GNAT SVN trunk on PowerPC and SPARC Eric Botcazou
22:59 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Benjamin Kosnik
22:52 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Michael Meissner
22:44 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. Michael Meissner
22:37 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
22:33 Re: Describing commercial support on our website Richard Guenther
22:13 Re: Describing commercial support on our website Joe Buck
22:06 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Richard Sandiford
22:03 GNAT SVN trunk on PowerPC and SPARC Joel Sherrill
22:01 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion tbp
21:32 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Michael Meissner
21:28 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Michael Meissner
21:26 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Michael Meissner
21:24 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Michael Meissner
20:30 RE: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Weddington, Eric
18:40 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. Ian Lance Taylor
18:26 Re: Testsuite infrastructure for comparing outputs Janis Johnson
16:39 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. Paolo Bonzini
15:19 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. J.C. Pizarro
14:53 RE: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. Dave Korn
13:55 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion J.C. Pizarro
13:43 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion J.C. Pizarro
11:59 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Sylvain Pion
11:38 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Ramana Radhakrishnan
11:00 Fwd: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Karthik Kumar
08:56 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Ramana Radhakrishnan
08:39 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Ramana Radhakrishnan
06:15 Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion Karthik Kumar
02:32 Re: Testsuite infrastructure for comparing outputs Sebastian Pop
00:37 Re: Testsuite infrastructure for comparing outputs Janis Johnson
00:11 Re: Bug in builtins.def, the execve. don't use execle, use execel. J.C. Pizarro
00:08 Describing commercial support on our website Manuel López-Ibáñez

November 28, 2007
23:25 Bug in builtins.def, the execve. J.C. Pizarro
23:21 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
23:17 Re: Errors issued while building GCC Ben Elliston
22:42 gcc-4.2-20071128 is now available gccadmin
22:37 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Stephane Hockenhull
22:25 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Stephane Hockenhull
22:24 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Jonathan Wakely
22:03 Re: svn trunk reaches nearly 1 GiB!!! That massive!!! Christophe Jaillet
21:25 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Andrew Pinski
21:04 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
21:00 Testsuite infrastructure for comparing outputs Sebastian Pop
20:58 Function specific optimizations call for discussion Michael Meissner
20:45 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Stephane Hockenhull
20:44 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes ?andtemplates 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
20:36 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Stephane Hockenhull
19:53 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Richard Sandiford
19:49 RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Dave Korn
19:01 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
18:54 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Stephane Hockenhull
17:35 RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Dave Korn
17:33 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Stephane Hockenhull
17:18 gnat1 huge time Joel Sherrill
16:16 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
15:51 RE: Errors issued while building GCC Dave Korn
14:32 Re: Reg: -fdump-translation-unit for "C" Praveen D V
13:30 Re: Errors issued while building GCC Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:17 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Daniel Jacobowitz
13:15 Re: Errors issued while building GCC Ankur Gupta
13:06 RE: Errors issued while building GCC Dave Korn
12:42 Re: Errors issued while building GCC Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:41 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
11:40 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
11:37 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
10:29 Fwd: Errors issued while building GCC Ankur Gupta
08:12 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Richard Sandiford
07:53 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-27) Andreas Meier
05:55 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-27) Doug Gregor
04:36 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:59 Got stuck on fork()'s loop when for gcov is used. J.C. Pizarro
03:36 Re: Compiler fails to find header files. NightStrike
03:23 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
03:11 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
02:40 Re: svn trunk reaches nearly 1 GiB!!! That massive!!! J.C. Pizarro
02:14 Re: svn trunk reaches nearly 1 GiB!!! That massive!!! Joe Buck
02:07 Re: svn trunk reaches nearly 1 GiB!!! That massive!!! Ismail DÃnmez
02:04 svn trunk reaches nearly 1 GiB!!! That massive!!! J.C. Pizarro
01:42 Compiler fails to find header files. mofomojo
01:34 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Benjamin Kosnik
01:28 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Joseph S. Myers
01:17 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
01:15 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
01:14 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Joseph S. Myers
01:10 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Joseph S. Myers
01:08 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Benjamin Kosnik
01:05 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Joseph S. Myers
01:00 Re: Why don't use "Code Coverage" in GCC? J.C. Pizarro
00:55 Re: Why don't use "Code Coverage" in GCC? Joe Buck
00:45 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
00:43 Why don't use "Code Coverage" in GCC? J.C. Pizarro
00:19 GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-27) Mark Mitchell

November 27, 2007
23:48 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
23:40 Re: Fwd: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy Ben Elliston
22:46 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
22:40 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
22:34 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
22:30 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
22:23 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
22:14 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
22:10 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
21:44 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Mark Mitchell
21:32 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Stephane Hockenhull
21:32 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Stephane Hockenhull
21:03 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Andreas Schwab
20:51 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Andreas Schwab
20:45 Re: ICE in gcc-3.3 & 4.1 Joe Buck
20:40 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Andrew Pinski
20:37 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Stephane Hockenhull
20:19 Re: ICE in gcc-3.3 & 4.1 Bruce Korb
20:04 Re: ICE in gcc-3.3 Joe Buck
19:58 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Alexandre Oliva
19:52 Re: [Fwd: performance with gcc -O0/-O2] Howard Chu
19:51 ICE in gcc-3.3 Bruce Korb
19:39 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
19:00 RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes andtemplates Dave Korn
18:47 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates 'Daniel Jacobowitz'
18:39 RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Dave Korn
18:33 Re: Dataflow question Paolo Bonzini
18:29 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Michael Eager
18:13 Re: PR1634: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list Daniel Berlin
18:11 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Joseph S. Myers
17:59 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Michael Eager
17:32 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Stephane Hockenhull
16:51 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Michael Matz
16:47 Dataflow question Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:35 Re: [Fwd: performance with gcc -O0/-O2] Andrew Haley
16:30 RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Dave Korn
16:10 Re: [Fwd: performance with gcc -O0/-O2] Howard Chu
16:09 RE: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Dave Korn
16:07 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Stephane Hockenhull
15:51 Re: [Fwd: performance with gcc -O0/-O2] Andi Kleen
15:46 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Stephane Hockenhull
15:27 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Joseph S. Myers
14:19 Re: Reg: -fdump-translation-unit for "C" Ramana Radhakrishnan
14:19 Re: [Fwd: performance with gcc -O0/-O2] Tim Prince
14:12 Reg: -fdump-translation-unit for "C" Praveen D V
14:10 Re: [Fwd: performance with gcc -O0/-O2] J.C. Pizarro
13:56 Re: [Fwd: performance with gcc -O0/-O2] Andrew Haley
13:47 Re: Scripted pass manager Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:36 Re: [Fwd: performance with gcc -O0/-O2] Richard Guenther
13:26 [Fwd: performance with gcc -O0/-O2] Howard Chu
12:39 Re: gcc 4.2.2, libgomp under cygwin Joerg Frochte
12:24 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
09:27 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Richard Sandiford
07:31 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Michael Eager
06:25 Re: gcc 4.2.2, libgomp under cygwin Brian Dessent
03:48 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Daniel Jacobowitz
03:46 Re: BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Ross Ridge
02:41 Re: Installation Problem Tim Prince
02:30 BITS_PER_UNIT larger than 8 -- word addressing Michael Eager
00:33 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
00:29 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Joe Buck
00:14 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva

November 26, 2007
22:43 gcc-4.1-20071126 is now available gccadmin
22:04 Re: Suggestion for removing flex and bison as a dependancy Zack Weinberg
21:42 Re: label conflict resolution for global variables Andrew Pinski
21:36 Fwd: label conflict resolution for global variables Andrew Ducore
21:31 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Stephane Hockenhull
19:55 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Tom Tromey
19:52 Installation Problem Joseph Maxwell
19:49 Re: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy J.C. Pizarro
19:13 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Joe Buck
19:09 Re: Fwd: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy Tom Tromey
19:08 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
19:01 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Daniel Jacobowitz
19:00 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Stephane Hockenhull
18:56 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Tom Tromey
18:55 Fwd: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy Karthik Kumar
18:43 Re: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy J.C. Pizarro
18:40 Re: why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Joe Buck
18:36 Re: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy David Daney
18:31 why are stl template classes not mangled as other classes and templates Stephane Hockenhull
18:22 Re: Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy Daniel Jacobowitz
18:19 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC J.C. Pizarro
18:10 Re: PR1634: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list Joseph S. Myers
18:10 Suggestion for removing flex/bison as a dependancy Karthik Kumar
17:56 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC J.C. Pizarro
17:41 Re: A question Joe Buck
17:30 Re: PR1634: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list Paolo Bonzini
17:05 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Michael Matz
16:54 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Michael Matz
16:43 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
15:57 A question Dmitri Lebedinski
15:41 gcc 4.2.2, libgomp under cygwin Joerg Frochte
15:36 PR1634: Request for gcc-cvs-patches list Steven Bosscher
14:11 Re: Idea to refine -Wtype-limits Gabriel Dos Reis
12:53 Re: Idea to refine -Wtype-limits Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:38 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC. Choice A or B? J.C. Pizarro
11:39 Re: Does gcc support compiling for windows x86-64? Howard Chu
11:37 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC. Choice A or B? J.C. Pizarro
10:51 Re: [RFC] [PATCH] 32-bit pointers in x86-64 Jan Beulich
10:38 RE: Re: Does gcc support compiling for windows x86-64? Dave Korn
10:34 Re: [RFC] [PATCH] 32-bit pointers in x86-64 Jan Beulich
10:11 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Guenther
08:59 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC. Choice A or B? Robert Dewar
06:59 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
06:24 Re: Infinite loop when trying to bootstrap trunk Ismail DÃnmez
06:10 RE: Designs for better debug info in GCC. Choice A or B? Ye, Joey
03:40 Re: Problem with ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN on ARM Daniel Jacobowitz
03:14 Re: Idea to refine -Wtype-limits Gabriel Dos Reis
02:10 Re: Idea to refine -Wtype-limits Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:05 Idea to refine -Wtype-limits Gerald Pfeifer

November 25, 2007
23:57 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Taras Glek
20:43 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell
18:45 Re: [RFC] [PATCH] 32-bit pointers in x86-64 Andrew Pinski
18:25 Re: [RFC] [PATCH] 32-bit pointers in x86-64 Paul Brook
18:22 Bounce Test Tom Watson
17:15 Re: [Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking] george at georgeshagov dot com
17:15 [Fwd: Libiberty problem in gcc-4.3 snapshots] Andris Pavenis
17:00 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Tom Tromey
16:29 [RFC] [PATCH] 32-bit pointers in x86-64 Luca
10:51 Re: Autovectorizing HIRLAM; some progress. Toon Moene
02:36 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC. Choice A or B? J.C. Pizarro
01:21 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
00:39 Re: Autovectorizing HIRLAM; some progress. Dorit Nuzman
00:20 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC. Choice A or B? J.C. Pizarro
00:11 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC. Choice A or B? J.C. Pizarro
00:10 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC. Choice A or B? J.C. Pizarro
00:02 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Guenther

November 24, 2007
23:33 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
23:31 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
23:29 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
23:22 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Alexandre Oliva
23:22 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Chris Lattner
22:42 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Alexandre Oliva
22:34 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
22:12 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Alexandre Oliva
22:01 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
21:55 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Alexandre Oliva
21:47 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Alexandre Oliva
21:24 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Kenner
20:48 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Guenther
20:46 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
20:21 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
20:11 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
19:06 Re: Status of GCC 4.3 on SPARC (Debian) Eric Botcazou
16:11 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Kenner
16:07 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Bernd Schmidt
15:18 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Guenther
15:08 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
15:02 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
13:52 Re: Autovectorizing HIRLAM; some progress. Toon Moene
13:47 Autovectorizing HIRLAM; some progress. Toon Moene
10:27 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Steven Bosscher
05:46 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Kenner
04:58 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
04:31 Re: Infinite loop when trying to bootstrap trunk Ismail DÃnmez
04:05 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
01:44 Infinite loop when trying to bootstrap trunk Ismail DÃnmez

November 23, 2007
23:56 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Steven Bosscher
23:56 Re: Re: Does gcc support compiling for windows x86-64? NightStrike
23:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
23:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
23:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
23:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
23:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
23:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
23:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
23:34 Re: Re: Does gcc support compiling for windows x86-64? Howard Chu
22:43 gcc-4.3-20071123 is now available gccadmin
19:07 Status of GCC 4.3 on IA64 (Debian) Martin Michlmayr
18:55 Re: Does gcc support compiling for windows x86-64? Ali, Muhammad
15:49 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Frank Ch. Eigler
09:51 Re: [Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking] Olivier Galibert
08:49 [Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking] george at georgeshagov dot com
04:10 Re: Does gcc support compiling for windows x86-64? Tim Prince
03:59 Re: -Wconversion bug in g++-4.3? Manuel López-Ibáñez
02:44 Re: -Wconversion bug in g++-4.3? Tom Browder
02:30 Re: -Wconversion bug in g++-4.3? Joe Buck
02:20 Re: Does gcc support compiling for windows x86-64? NightStrike
00:25 Re: Simple way to write almost same pattern? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

November 22, 2007
23:02 Re: -Wconversion bug in g++-4.3? Manuel López-Ibáñez
21:40 Re: -Wconversion bug in g++-4.3? Tom Browder
19:55 Does gcc support compiling for windows x86-64? Ali, Muhammad
19:40 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Guenther
19:28 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Frank Ch. Eigler
18:57 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Frank Ch. Eigler
17:54 RiW k sLG артур П.
16:46 Re: -Wconversion bug in g++-4.3? Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:38 RE: Simple way to write almost same pattern? Dave Korn
15:30 RE: Simple way to write almost same pattern? Bingfeng Mei
15:00 RE: Simple way to write almost same pattern? Dave Korn
14:34 -Wconversion bug in g++-4.3? Tom Browder
14:30 Simple way to write almost same pattern? Bingfeng Mei
08:00 Re: unsatisfied link error David Daney
07:22 unsatisfied link error Mark Polo

November 21, 2007
23:32 Re: Problem with ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN on ARM Geert Bosch
22:44 gcc-4.2-20071121 is now available gccadmin
22:31 Status of GCC 4.3 on SPARC (Debian) Martin Michlmayr
21:40 Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #21623] boot.h: Use the "z" register constraint Wouter van Gulik
21:07 Re: Problem with ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN on ARM Richard Kenner
21:02 Re: Problem with ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN on ARM Daniel Jacobowitz
20:56 Problem with ARM_DOUBLEWORD_ALIGN on ARM Richard Kenner
18:04 Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #21623] boot.h: Use the "z" register constraint Shaun Jackman

November 20, 2007
22:05 Re: Build failure of trunk on i686-pc-gnu-linux Thomas Schwinge
19:16 Re: bug with -fleading-underscore doubling underscore in some cases on templates Daniel Jacobowitz
18:57 bug with -fleading-underscore doubling underscore in some cases on templates Stephane Hockenhull
13:34 Re: SIMD-enabled and -lpthread incompatible? Tim Prince
12:52 Re: undocumented optimization options Richard Guenther
11:33 Re: undocumented optimization options Razya Ladelsky
08:32 Re: Events output fail in libjava David Daney
08:25 Events output fail in libjava Revital1 Eres
05:10 Re: SIMD-enabled and -lpthread incompatible? Daniel Verkamp
01:22 Re: Build failure of trunk on i686-pc-gnu-linux Andrew Pinski
01:21 Re: Build failure of trunk on i686-pc-gnu-linux Ismail DÃnmez
01:12 Re: Build failure of trunk on i686-pc-gnu-linux Thomas Schwinge
00:02 SIMD-enabled and -lpthread incompatible? J.C. Pizarro

November 19, 2007
23:18 Re: [LTO] LTO breaks if debug info is stripped from object files William Maddox
22:43 gcc-4.1-20071119 is now available gccadmin
20:19 Re: Earlyclobber misunderstanding in local-alloc.c? Ian Lance Taylor
18:54 Re: Attributes on structs Mark Mitchell
17:03 Re: FW: matrix linking Joe Buck
16:55 Re: Attributes on structs Jason Merrill
13:33 Re: Has anyone idea/plans for GCC-4.4? No such roadmap, I not idea. Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:22 Re: structuring a front-end subdirectory Olivier Hainque
13:18 Re: Has anyone idea/plans for GCC-4.4? No such roadmap, I not idea. J.C. Pizarro
13:12 Re: Has anyone idea/plans for GCC-4.4? No such roadmap, I not idea. Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:58 Re: own target: combine emits invalid RTL Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:28 Re: structuring a front-end subdirectory Paolo Bonzini
12:14 Re: structuring a front-end subdirectory Olivier Hainque
10:21 RE: Dependency check between instructions? Bingfeng Mei
09:49 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
09:11 Re: structuring a front-end subdirectory Paolo Bonzini
08:37 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Gabriel Dos Reis
08:26 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Gabriel Dos Reis
05:19 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
04:30 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
04:23 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
04:16 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
04:13 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
01:08 Re: Has anyone idea/plans for GCC-4.4? No such roadmap, I not idea. J.C. Pizarro
00:54 Has anyone idea/plans for GCC-4.4? No such roadmap, I not idea. J.C. Pizarro
00:32 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner

November 18, 2007
23:46 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:45 Re: Removing #include "*.c" Ben Elliston
22:41 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Brendon Costa
22:25 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Steven Bosscher
22:12 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Steven Bosscher
21:29 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Mark Mitchell
20:55 Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Eric Botcazou
20:52 Re: own target: combine emits invalid RTL Michael_fogel
20:50 Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 H.J. Lu
20:44 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
20:11 Re: [LTO] LTO breaks if debug info is stripped from object files Mark Mitchell
19:57 Build failure of trunk on i686-pc-gnu-linux Thomas Schwinge
19:40 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Kaveh R. GHAZI
19:34 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Kaveh R. GHAZI
17:58 Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Eric Botcazou
17:09 Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Diego Novillo
15:17 Re: Limits of stage3 changes David Edelsohn
09:10 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Steven Bosscher
06:33 RE: FW: matrix linking george
06:33 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Kaveh R. GHAZI
02:23 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Vincent Lefevre
02:05 Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Hans-Peter Nilsson

November 17, 2007
18:28 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
14:39 Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Jonathan Wakely
14:15 Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Eric Botcazou
13:41 Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Jonathan Wakely
11:50 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Paolo Bonzini
11:39 Earlyclobber misunderstanding in local-alloc.c? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
02:41 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Tim Prince
02:31 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:33 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Geert Bosch

November 16, 2007
23:11 Re: Limits of stage3 changes Richard Guenther
23:02 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Tom Tromey
22:48 gcc-4.3-20071116 is now available gccadmin
22:43 Limits of stage3 changes Steven Bosscher
22:42 Re: Attributes on structs Jason Merrill
22:37 Re: Attributes on structs Jason Merrill
22:23 Re: [LTO] LTO breaks if debug info is stripped from object files William Maddox
22:23 Re: own target: combine emits invalid RTL Jim Wilson
22:20 Re: bootstrap failure with rev 130208 Jim Wilson
22:08 Re: How to let GCC produce flat assembly Paul Brook
21:43 Re: [LTO] LTO breaks if debug info is stripped from object files Mark Mitchell
20:33 Re: [LTO] LTO breaks if debug info is stripped from object files Daniel Jacobowitz
20:27 Re: [LTO] LTO breaks if debug info is stripped from object files David Edelsohn
20:03 Re: [LTO] LTO breaks if debug info is stripped from object files Diego Novillo
19:58 Re: Help understanding overloaded templates Doug Gregor
19:21 RE: Progress on GCC plugins ? Gerald.Williams
19:13 Re: FW: matrix linking Joe Buck
19:09 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
18:54 FW: matrix linking george
18:41 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Joe Buck
18:29 RE: Progress on GCC plugins ? Gerald.Williams
18:17 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Martin Jambor
17:52 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Martin Michlmayr
17:46 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
17:38 RE: Progress on GCC plugins ? Dave Korn
17:35 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
17:32 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Benjamin Smedberg
17:31 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Joe Buck
17:27 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:27 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Joe Buck
17:25 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
17:18 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Tom Tromey
17:16 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:15 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Bernd Schmidt
17:10 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Joe Buck
17:08 RE: Progress on GCC plugins ? Dep, Khushil (GE Money)
17:03 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
16:58 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? David Edelsohn
16:56 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:53 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
16:43 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Andrew Haley
16:29 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
16:24 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
16:21 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
16:18 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:15 Re: Build Failure for gcc-4.3-20071109 [SOLVED] Tom Browder
16:12 ICE in in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:701 Christophe LYON
16:10 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:08 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Andrew Haley
15:49 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
14:21 RE: own target: combine emits invalid RTL Dave Korn
13:50 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Alexander Lamaison
13:33 Re: own target: combine emits invalid RTL Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:01 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Martin Jambor
11:16 RE: Progress on GCC plugins ? Alexander Lamaison
11:07 RE: How to let GCC produce flat assembly Dave Korn
10:56 Re: How to let GCC produce flat assembly Li Wang
09:38 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Andrew Haley
09:25 RE: How to let GCC produce flat assembly Dave Korn
07:08 Re: bootstrap failure with rev 130208 Thomas Koenig
05:57 Re: How to let GCC produce flat assembly Li Wang
05:03 Re: Modulo operation in C for -ve values Alan Modra
03:56 Modulo operation in C for -ve values Deepak Gaur
03:21 Help understanding overloaded templates Rob Quill
01:58 Re: How to let GCC produce flat assembly Joe Buck
01:42 Re: bootstrap failure with rev 130208 Jim Wilson
01:39 Re: How to let GCC produce flat assembly Jim Wilson
01:24 Re: Build Failure for gcc-4.3-20071109 Tom Browder
00:24 Re: Build Failure for gcc-4.3-20071109 Jim Wilson
00:21 Re: How to let GCC produce flat assembly Li Wang
00:01 Re: own target: combine emits invalid RTL Jim Wilson

November 15, 2007
23:59 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
23:50 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
23:37 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
23:25 Re: Attributes on structs Mark Mitchell
23:24 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Emmanuel Fleury
23:05 own target: combine emits invalid RTL Michael_fogel
22:55 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
22:54 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
22:53 [LTO] LTO breaks if debug info is stripped from object files William Maddox
22:49 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
22:47 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
22:46 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
22:05 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Benjamin Smedberg
22:04 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Andrew Haley
21:53 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
21:46 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
21:43 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
21:31 bootstrap failure with rev 130208 Thomas Koenig
21:28 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
20:25 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Richard Kenner
19:43 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Joe Buck
19:35 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Diego Novillo
17:48 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Christoph Quirin Lauter
17:38 Re: How to let GCC produce flat assembly Joe Buck
17:36 Handling overloaded template functions with variadic parameters Rob Quill
14:41 How to let GCC produce flat assembly Li Wang
13:58 Re: undocumented optimization options Razya Ladelsky
12:01 Re: [RFC][modulo-sched] Fix scheduling order within a cycle Ayal Zaks
11:56 Re: internal compiler error when build toolchains using gcc 4.1.2 Clemens Koller
10:49 Build Failure for gcc-4.3-20071109 Tom Browder
09:53 TREAT VERY URGENT GRAHAM BASH
03:32 Re: internal compiler error when build toolchains using gcc 4.1.2 马骅
03:22 Re: internal compiler error when build toolchains using gcc 4.1.2 Tim Prince
02:19 internal compiler error when build toolchains using gcc 4.1.2 马骅

November 14, 2007
23:28 Re: Attributes on structs Jason Merrill
22:43 gcc-4.2-20071114 is now available gccadmin
19:42 Re: Can CODE_FOR_$(div$V$I$a3$) ever match? Jim Wilson
18:59 Re: Problem when build glibc on IA64 Jim Wilson
16:46 Re: alias and pointers analysis Diego Novillo
16:45 Re: [RFC][modulo-sched] Fix scheduling order within a cycle Revital1 Eres
16:40 Re: alias and pointers analysis Fran Baena
14:59 Re: How to describe function units allocation Li Wang
14:15 Re: alias and pointers analysis Diego Novillo
14:06 Re: How to describe function units allocation Pranav Bhandarkar
13:54 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Joseph S. Myers
11:25 RE: facing problem with the g++ testing Dave Korn
10:27 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Vincent Lefevre
10:27 facing problem with the g++ testing Prabhu Kalyan Rout
07:53 Re: c-pch.c:149: undefined reference to `_executable_checksum' 马骅
07:16 c-pch.c:149: undefined reference to `_executable_checksum' 马骅
04:28 Re: alias and pointers analysis deepak poola

November 13, 2007
23:54 Re: [RFC][modulo-sched] Fix scheduling order within a cycle Ayal Zaks
22:49 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames withICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Kevin D. Kissell
22:11 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Andrew Pinski
20:02 Re: dynamic_cast problem Jonathan Wakely
19:39 Re: Two questions on register allocation & reload. Vladimir Makarov
19:01 Two questions on register allocation & reload. Alexander Monakov
18:55 Re: alias and pointers analysis Diego Novillo
18:38 Re: alias and pointers analysis Fran Baena
18:12 Re: undocumented optimization options Ian Lance Taylor
16:37 dynamic_cast problem ganesh subramonian
16:12 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR David Daney
15:46 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Geert Bosch
15:11 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Ralf Baechle
15:04 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Ralf Baechle
14:49 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Franck Bui-Huu
14:39 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Kevin D. Kissell
14:35 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Michael Matz
14:22 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Franck Bui-Huu
14:02 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Ralf Baechle
13:17 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Michael Matz
13:15 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Franck Bui-Huu
13:12 Re: [RFC][modulo-sched] Fix scheduling order within a cycle Revital1 Eres
12:14 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Michael Matz
12:12 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Ralf Baechle
11:49 Re: Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR Andrew Haley
10:50 Re: internal compiler error when compile busybox 1.1.3 using buildroot in cygwin Ramana Radhakrishnan
09:03 Re: internal compiler error when compile busybox 1.1.3 using buildroot in cygwin Ramana Radhakrishnan
08:59 internal compiler error when compile busybox 1.1.3 using buildroot in cygwin 马骅
08:45 Re: Declaring artificial fields Gabriele SVELTO
07:52 Cannot unwind through MIPS signal frames with ICACHE_REFILLS_WORKAROUND_WAR David Daney
06:19 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell
03:04 Hurennetzwerk News Harald webmaster
02:30 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Geert Bosch

November 12, 2007
22:43 gcc-4.1-20071112 is now available gccadmin
20:08 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Steven Bosscher
18:22 Re: Declaring artificial fields Ian Lance Taylor
18:17 Re: help for visual basic if you connot then sent me other helper's Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 Re: How to instrument at source code level? Ian Lance Taylor
18:09 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
18:05 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Joe Buck
17:54 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
17:52 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
17:37 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Michael Matz
16:56 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell
16:28 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
16:25 Re: undocumented optimization options Mark Mitchell
16:24 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
16:07 Declaring artificial fields Gabriele SVELTO
16:06 help for visual basic if you connot then sent me other helper's hgaansari
15:39 RE: [PATCH][varmap] New var-mappings-branch created Dave Korn
15:18 [PATCH][varmap] New var-mappings-branch created Richard Guenther
15:02 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources François-Xavier Coudert
14:33 Re: undocumented optimization options Richard Guenther
14:28 Re: undocumented optimization options Razya Ladelsky
14:06 Re: Newbie Matthieu Kaczmarek
14:04 How to instrument at source code level? 胡鹏飞
13:46 Re: Newbie Eric Botcazou
13:19 Removing #include "*.c" Rob Quill
12:59 Re: structuring a front-end subdirectory Olivier Hainque
10:55 Re: Reload using a live register to reload into Pranav Bhandarkar
10:28 Re: undocumented optimization options Richard Guenther
09:06 Re: undocumented optimization options Razya Ladelsky
08:03 [RFC][modulo-sched] Fix scheduling order within a cycle Revital1 Eres
02:49 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell
02:34 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell

November 11, 2007
21:30 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Joe Buck
19:13 Re: Tool chain configuration: GNU/* sharing stuff with GNU/Linux Joseph S. Myers
15:06 Re: Tool chain configuration: GNU/* sharing stuff with GNU/Linux Samuel Thibault
14:58 Tool chain configuration: GNU/* sharing stuff with GNU/Linux Thomas Schwinge
10:06 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Uros Bizjak
09:27 Re: Newbie Paolo Bonzini

November 10, 2007
19:44 Re: Newbie Laurynas Biveinis
16:44 Re: Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Richard Sandiford
08:45 about the coding of visual basic hgaansari
00:13 Re: gcc-4.3-20071109 is now available Joseph S. Myers

November 09, 2007
22:54 Re: Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Andreas Tobler
22:46 gcc-4.3-20071109 is now available gccadmin
22:06 Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Art Haas
21:33 Re: builtin_frame_address for stack pointer Jim Wilson
19:02 Newbie Matthieu Kaczmarek
18:40 Re: Reload using a live register to reload into Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:12 Re: structuring a front-end subdirectory Joseph S. Myers
18:04 Re: Inserting new parameter in gcc Manuel López-Ibáñez
16:44 structuring a front-end subdirectory Olivier Hainque
15:03 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
14:23 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
13:29 RE: Progress on GCC plugins ? Gerald.Williams
12:42 Re: Inserting new parameter in gcc Manuel López-Ibáñez
12:31 Re: Inserting new parameter in gcc Basile STARYNKEVITCH
12:22 Re: Inserting new parameter in gcc Manuel López-Ibáñez
11:28 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Michael Matz
09:10 Inserting new parameter in gcc Juan Luis Liarte
02:13 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
02:09 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
01:26 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
01:26 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
01:22 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
01:11 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Joe Buck
00:08 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar

November 08, 2007
20:51 Re: Reload using a live register to reload into Eric Botcazou
20:51 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
20:41 New branches for ix86 backporting Michael Meissner
20:14 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
20:07 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
19:23 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Mark Mitchell
19:13 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Andrew Pinski
18:44 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell
18:37 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC David Daney
18:28 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell
18:18 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
17:48 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
16:37 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
16:32 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
16:11 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Michael Matz
15:13 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC H.J. Lu
14:02 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Robert Dewar
14:01 Re: Reload using a live register to reload into Pranav Bhandarkar
13:02 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
12:57 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Florian Weimer
11:22 RE: Progress on GCC plugins ? Dave Korn
10:23 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Michael Matz
10:11 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Emmanuel Fleury
09:54 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Richard Guenther
07:50 Re: Adding custom scheduler dependency between 2 insns Maxim Kuvyrkov
07:47 RE: Adding custom scheduler dependency between 2 insns Tomer Benyamini
07:30 Re: Adding custom scheduler dependency between 2 insns Maxim Kuvyrkov
07:21 Adding custom scheduler dependency between 2 insns Tomer Benyamini
06:39 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Ian Lance Taylor
05:44 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
05:15 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
05:14 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
05:01 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
00:35 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell
00:28 Re: Attributes on structs Joseph S. Myers
00:15 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC David Edelsohn
00:10 Re: Attributes on structs Mark Mitchell
00:01 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Brendon Costa
00:00 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Mark Mitchell

November 07, 2007
23:44 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Brendon Costa
23:43 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Brendon Costa
23:28 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? David Edelsohn
23:05 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Daniel Jacobowitz
22:57 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Ian Lance Taylor
22:53 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
22:46 Attributes on structs Jason Merrill
22:44 gcc-4.2-20071107 is now available gccadmin
22:43 Re: Reload using a live register to reload into Eric Botcazou
22:32 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Brendon Costa
21:59 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
21:55 Re: Fw: error: array type has incomplete element type ?? Jonathan Wakely
21:43 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Brendon Costa
19:11 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
19:03 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
18:45 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC Alexandre Oliva
17:52 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? David Edelsohn
17:49 Re: undocumented optimization options Kenneth Zadeck
17:48 RE: Progress on GCC plugins ? Dave Korn
17:47 Re: undocumented optimization options Razya Ladelsky
17:34 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Chris Lattner
17:28 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Robert Dewar
17:25 GCC-4.x and 3.x for msp430 RaÃl SÃnchez Siles
17:20 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC (was: Re: [vta] don't let debug insns get in the way of simple vect reduction) Michael Matz
17:11 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Tom Tromey
16:47 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
16:41 Re: Progress on GCC plugins ? Joe Buck
16:40 Re: How to turn off NRVO in gcc Ian Lance Taylor
16:37 Re: How to turn off NRVO in gcc Joe Buck
16:16 Re: Designs for better debug info in GCC (was: Re: [vta] don't let debug insns get in the way of simple vect reduction) Ian Lance Taylor
15:49 Re: How to turn off NRVO in gcc Ian Lance Taylor
14:35 Re: Dependency check between instructions? Maxim Kuvyrkov
14:17 Dependency check between instructions? Bingfeng Mei
14:10 How to turn off NRVO in gcc Debarshi Sanyal
12:57 Re: Reload using a live register to reload into Pranav Bhandarkar
10:53 Re: About VLIW backend Pranav Bhandarkar
09:05 Re: Target specific attributes to variables Pranav Bhandarkar
08:46 Re: Reload using a live register to reload into Eric Botcazou
08:37 Re: Reload using a live register to reload into Pranav Bhandarkar
08:19 Progress on GCC plugins ? Emmanuel Fleury
08:14 Re: Reload using a live register to reload into Eric Botcazou
08:11 Re: About VLIW backend Pranav Bhandarkar
08:03 Re: DEBUG_INSN that is not an insn Alexandre Oliva
07:52 Designs for better debug info in GCC (was: Re: [vta] don't let debug insns get in the way of simple vect reduction) Alexandre Oliva
07:40 Re: About VLIW backend Pranav Bhandarkar
07:21 Target specific attributes to variables Naveen H.S.
05:50 Re: About VLIW backend Ian Lance Taylor
05:13 Re: About VLIW backend Li Wang
05:05 Re: About VLIW backend Robert Dewar
04:37 Fw: error: array type has incomplete element type ?? onkar . mahajan
04:33 About VLIW backend Li Wang
00:39 Medical Doctor List Novak N Jesse

November 06, 2007
21:40 Re: Wrong ChangeLog entry in gcc/ChangeLog H.J. Lu
20:53 Re: Question regarding GCC fdump option Tom Tromey
19:54 Re: Old UTF16 patch Lawrence Crowl
19:34 Using crlibm as the default math library in GCC sources Uros Bizjak
19:29 Re: strict aliasing Joe Buck
19:20 Re: PR target/30961 (was: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04)) H.J. Lu
18:40 Re: PR target/30961 (was: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04)) Ulrich Weigand
18:31 Re: strict aliasing skaller
18:22 Re: strict aliasing skaller
17:39 Re: strict aliasing Andrew Haley
17:32 Re: strict aliasing Joe Buck
17:29 Re: PR target/30961 (was: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04)) H.J. Lu
17:11 Re: strict aliasing skaller
17:06 Re: strict aliasing skaller
15:59 Re: strict aliasing Ian Lance Taylor
15:52 Re: strict aliasing Joe Buck
15:49 Re: strict aliasing Joe Buck
15:47 Re: strict aliasing Ian Lance Taylor
15:30 Re: strict aliasing skaller
15:12 Re: strict aliasing skaller
14:38 Re: strict aliasing Ross Ridge
14:30 PR target/30961 (was: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04)) Ulrich Weigand
14:30 Re: strict aliasing Ian Lance Taylor
12:43 Reload using a live register to reload into Pranav Bhandarkar
08:56 Re: strict aliasing skaller
08:16 Re: strict aliasing Ian Lance Taylor
08:05 Help with debug info for fixed-point data types Mohamed Shafi
01:58 Re: strict aliasing skaller
01:39 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) Mark Mitchell
00:25 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) Mark Mitchell

November 05, 2007
23:50 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) H.J. Lu
23:40 Wrong ChangeLog entry in gcc/ChangeLog H.J. Lu
23:40 Re: DEBUG_INSN that is not an insn Eric Botcazou
23:30 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) Mark Mitchell
22:41 gcc-4.1-20071105 is now available gccadmin
20:09 Re: strict aliasing Joe Buck
19:30 Re: strict aliasing Ross Ridge
19:14 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Paul Brook
18:44 Re: strict aliasing skaller
18:34 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) Joseph S. Myers
18:30 Re: strict aliasing skaller
18:20 Re: strict aliasing Joe Buck
18:16 Re: strict aliasing Ian Lance Taylor
18:11 Re: strict aliasing skaller
17:57 Re: strict aliasing Ian Lance Taylor
17:56 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) Mark Mitchell
17:48 Question regarding GCC fdump option Johan Bohlin
17:28 RE: Documentation Error in Using the GNU Compiler Collection 4.2.1 & 4.3.0 Dave Korn
17:21 Re: Extending jumps after block reordering Gregory B. Prokopski
17:15 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) H.J. Lu
16:44 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) Paolo Bonzini
16:28 Documentation Error in Using the GNU Compiler Collection 4.2.1 & 4.3.0 Craig Dedo
15:57 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) H.J. Lu
15:49 Re: Why is this still not allowed by gcc while MSVC does(const template argument) Ian Lance Taylor
11:30 Re: DEBUG_INSN that is not an insn Richard Guenther
09:29 DEBUG_INSN that is not an insn Steven Bosscher
06:56 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) Alexandre Oliva
06:50 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) Alexandre Oliva
03:32 GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04) Mark Mitchell

November 04, 2007
23:51 Re: undocumented optimization options Mark Mitchell
23:49 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Mark Mitchell
20:06 Re: [wwwdocs] PATCH Re: Optimization of conditional access to globals: thread-unsafe? Kai Henningsen
15:28 The Linux binutils 2.18.50.0.3 is released H.J. Lu
14:33 strict aliasing skaller
13:04 [wwwdocs] PATCH Re: Optimization of conditional access to globals: thread-unsafe? Gerald Pfeifer
12:00 Why is this still not allowed by gcc while MSVC does(const template argument) Jun Chen
06:14 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. David Miller
05:59 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. Joe Buck
05:32 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. Ted Byers
03:45 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. David Miller
03:16 Re: GNAT is required to build ada Robert Dewar
03:13 Re: GNAT is required to build ada Robert Dewar
02:02 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Daniel Berlin
01:32 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. Ted Byers
01:11 Re: GNAT is required to build ada J.C. Pizarro

November 03, 2007
23:08 Re: GNAT is required to build ada David Miller
22:41 Re: GNAT is required to build ada Robert Dewar
22:28 Re: GNAT is required to build ada David Miller
20:41 Re: undocumented optimization options Steven Bosscher
20:00 Re: GNAT is required to build ada Toon Moene
19:18 Re: GNAT is required to build ada Richard Guenther
19:12 Re: GNAT is required to build ada Toon Moene
17:22 Re: undocumented optimization options Gerald Pfeifer
17:18 Re: GNAT is required to build ada Gerald Pfeifer
16:37 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Richard Guenther
16:23 RE: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Bingfeng Mei
15:41 Re: GNAT is required to build ada Robert Dewar
15:27 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Zdenek Dvorak
15:23 Re: GNAT is required to build ada Arnaud Charlet
15:19 GNAT is required to build ada Jack Howarth
14:59 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? J.C. Pizarro
14:55 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? J.C. Pizarro
14:55 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Kenneth Zadeck
14:52 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Kenneth Zadeck
14:47 RE: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? J.C. Pizarro
14:25 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Zdenek Dvorak
13:52 RE: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Kenneth Zadeck
11:26 Re: gomp slowness skaller
09:35 Re: gomp slowness Sylvain Pion
08:08 Re: gomp slowness Jakub Jelinek
06:10 Re: gomp slowness Ian Lance Taylor
05:51 Re: gomp slowness skaller
05:41 Re: gomp slowness skaller
05:36 Re: gomp slowness Ian Lance Taylor
05:20 Re: gomp slowness skaller
03:56 Re: gomp slowness Robert Dewar
03:55 Re: gomp slowness Robert Dewar
02:59 Re: gomp slowness skaller
02:49 Re: gomp slowness skaller
02:46 Re: gomp slowness skaller
01:55 Re: gomp slowness Ian Lance Taylor
01:53 Re: gomp slowness skaller
01:45 Re: gomp slowness Andrew Pinski
01:38 Re: gomp slowness skaller
01:34 Re: gomp slowness skaller
01:27 Re: gomp slowness skaller

November 02, 2007
22:47 gcc-4.3-20071102 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Re: gcc 4.3.0 revision 129794 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 John David Anglin
20:58 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. David Miller
19:47 Re: gomp slowness Joel Dice
19:33 Re: gomp slowness Robert Dewar
19:22 Re: Autovectorized HIRLAM - latest results. Toon Moene
19:00 Re: gomp slowness Olivier Galibert
18:56 Re: gomp slowness Olivier Galibert
17:29 Re: gomp slowness Ian Lance Taylor
16:38 Re: gomp slowness skaller
16:34 Re: RFC: Creating a live, all-encompassing architectural document for GCC Gerald Pfeifer
16:31 Re: gomp slowness skaller
16:08 Re: Dependency output Tom Tromey
15:11 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. J.C. Pizarro
14:46 Re: gomp slowness Daniel Jacobowitz
14:42 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. NightStrike
14:40 Re: gomp slowness Ian Lance Taylor
14:34 RE: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Bingfeng Mei
12:38 Re: Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Ramana Radhakrishnan
12:24 Tree-SSA and POST_INC address mode inompatible in GCC4? Bingfeng Mei
11:14 Re: Last argument of lang_hooks_for_callgraph.analzye_tree unused? Diego Novillo
11:07 Dependency output timtuun
08:55 Re: Extending jumps after block reordering Eric Botcazou
08:48 Re: gomp slowness skaller
04:02 Re: gomp slowness Gary Funck
03:50 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. Ted Byers
02:56 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. David Miller
02:34 Re: Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. NightStrike
01:32 Results of 7z-4.55 performance with current GCCs. J.C. Pizarro
00:08 Re: Old UTF16 patch Joseph S. Myers

November 01, 2007
23:31 Old UTF16 patch Elena Zannoni
21:46 Re: Any Ada changes for GCC 4.3? Gerald Pfeifer
21:39 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Diego Novillo
21:34 Re: What means the fat .gch file? Gerald Pfeifer
21:20 What means the fat .gch file? J.C. Pizarro
21:04 Re: New FAILures on MIPS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr33723.c... Uros Bizjak
20:55 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Gerald Pfeifer
18:37 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Andrew MacLeod
18:28 New FAILures on MIPS: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-1.C and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr33723.c... David Daney
18:27 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Richard Guenther
18:25 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Richard Guenther
18:00 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Daniel Jacobowitz
17:55 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Jack Lloyd
17:38 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Andrew MacLeod
17:08 undocumented optimization options Janis Johnson
16:55 Re: Last argument of lang_hooks_for_callgraph.analzye_tree unused? Jan Hubicka
16:50 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Andrew Pinski
16:31 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Benjamin Kosnik
16:01 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Andrew MacLeod
15:45 Re: GCC 4.3 release schedule Gerald Pfeifer
15:32 Last argument of lang_hooks_for_callgraph.analzye_tree unused? Diego Novillo
11:33 Can CODE_FOR_$(div$V$I$a3$) ever match? Kai Henningsen


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3