This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Optimization of conditional access to globals: thread-unsafe?


On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:14:06PM +0300, Tomash Brechko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:54:22 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-10/msg00607.html for a test case
> > that shows where it can go horrible wrong (optimized code significantly 
> > slower than unoptimized code) Admittedly it is a constructed
> > one, but I don't think it is that unrealistic.
> 
> Thanks.  I had to change %Lu to %lu, and the example shows the point
> when run multiple times.

Sorry that was a glibc'ism. The correct C99 specifier would be %llu 
or %qu for traditional BSD.

-Andi


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]