This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: cannot pass objects of non-POD type
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:37:25PM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 10/24/07, Jack Lloyd <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Is there a reason it's not just an error, then? (As a user) I don't
> > see the point of something being a warning when the compiled code is
> > intentionally set up to crash.
> Because the C++ standard (and the C standard) has mentioned that you
> cannot diagnostic an undefined runtime behavior. So the code is valid
> semantically but undefined at runtime.
But the way that the object is passed in this case, and the stack layout,
are completely defined on any platform that obeys the cross-platform API
you will find at
and this definition specifies that everything will look exactly the same
as if it were a POD with the same members declared in the same order.
For that reason, while I'm not surprised by the warning message, I
am surprised that the code crashes; it would seem to require extra
work to make it do so.
Not that I would support this particular programming style;
varargs/stdargs gives up type safety and risks runtime errors.