This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: From SSA back to GIMPLE.
- From: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
- To: "J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "Jose ." <kasty dot jose at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:10:43 +0200
- Subject: Re: From SSA back to GIMPLE.
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Dear Mr. Pizzaro,
> Is not it easy to write 3 stages GENERIC->GIMPLE->RTL instead of 5 stages?
> Is meaningful the optimization of the complex bi-transformation
> Is more powerful GENERIC->GIMPLE->RTL + "trial-and-error" local optimization?
> Sincerely, J.C. Pizarro
everyone else here is too polite to tell it to you, but could you please
shut up, until:
-- you learn at least basics of English grammar (so that we can actually
understand what you are saying), and
-- at least something about gcc and compilers in general (so that what
you say makes some sense)?
While I was mildly annoyed by your previous "contributions" to the
discussion in the gcc mailing list, I could tolerate those. But
answering a seriously ment question of a beginner by this confusing
and completely irrelevant drivel is another thing.