This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: df_insn_refs_record's handling of global_regs[]


From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <seongbae.park@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 17:25:14 -0700

> If you're not in a hurry, can you wait
> till I run the regtest against 4.2 on x86-64 ?
> I've already discussed the patch with Kenny
> and we agreed that this is the right approach,
> but I'd like to see the clean regtest on x86 for both 4.2 and 4.3
> before I approve.
> Thanks,

I am in no rush, please let me know if you want some help
tracking down the failure you are seeing.

Since you say it is a libgomp failure... I wonder if some of
the atomic primitives need some side effect markings which
are missing and thus exposed by not clobbering global regs
at call sites any more.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]