This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem?

From: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
To: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:13:43 -0400
Subject: Re: outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem?
References: <873awxivs7.fsf@firetop.home> <b798aad50709291013x3a642b5bv2f432a36bd215989@mail.gmail.com> <87ir5tgulc.fsf@firetop.home> <de8d50360709291209g3c54ef8bi28a82c8870f966ee@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/29/07, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:

> Except I think it is wrong for PowerPC where dividing by 0 will never trap.

No the patch is correct.

The issue that you are bringing up is orthogonal to the fix.  If
tree_could_trap_p(1/0) == true on ppc, and that is wrong, then
tree_could_trap_p() should be fixed for PPC.

References:
- outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem?
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem?
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem?
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]