This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk


"Richard Guenther" <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:

> > We've got a test case with gcc 4.2 for which compilation time goes
> > from nine minutes to 30 seconds when we use that option.  I know the
> > code is much better in mainline.  Still, I would prefer to keep the
> > option unless we are certain that similar compilation time blowouts
> > can not occur.  Lots of code can profit from optimization even with
> > struct aliasing turned off.
> 
> Well, ATM the flag doesn't work.  And honestly we have enough "kinds"
> of alias bugs - adding another knob to get different wrong-code bugs
> doesn't look too appealing to me ;)

Well, if the -fno-tree-salias flag now causes wrong-code bugs then I
certainly agree that it should be eliminated.

The gcc 4.2 issue we saw wasn't wrong code either way, it was just a
compilation time issue.

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]