This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: "Andreas Krebbel" <Andreas dot Krebbel at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 19 Sep 2007 07:53:20 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3
References: <46E71CEA.8030902@codesourcery.com> <20070919083132.GA5984@homer.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>

"Andreas Krebbel" <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com> writes:

> there are 3 simple patches waiting for review which I hoped to get in
> in stage 2.  They should be a nop for targets not exploiting the new
> insn attribute.  So I hope they still qualify for early stage 3.  I've
> several patches on my harddisk relying on that feature to be present
> so I would really like to see them upstream.

I'm sorry I haven't had time to reply to this patch, but I'm not
entirely happy with it.  Conceptually it seems reasonable, but I don't
understand why your implementation has to work the way it does; it
seems overly complicated.  And I wonder whether it wouldn't be simpler
to achieve the same effect using constraints.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3
  - From: Andreas Krebbel

References:
- GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3
  - From: Andreas Krebbel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]