This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ICE in langhooks.c on SPU
On 8/28/07, Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com> wrote:
> On 28 August 2007 15:10, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> >
> > Or maybe on ppc/spu enum bitfields are signed and the following
> >
> > DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (decl) = -1;
> > gcc_assert (DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (decl) >= function_code);
> >
> > doesnt work?
>
> I saw what you did there, and thought it slightly peculiar. Wouldn't
>
> DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (decl) = function_code;
> gcc_assert (DECL_FUNCTION_CODE (decl) == function_code);
>
> have worked just as well, or is there some gotcha you were trying to avoid with
> the dead store trick?
Oh, indeed - this looks like it should have less problems. Revital, if that
works for you then changing the code above to what Dave suggests is also
pre-approved (but it really might be that SPU needs more than 1024 builtin
functions of a kind).
Richard.