This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?

From: "Stephen M. Kenton" <skenton at ou dot edu>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:05:54 -0500
Subject: Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?
References: <46C603EC.4070004@ou.edu> <de8d50360708171328g20210642u5b2d153827febbcd@mail.gmail.com>

Andrew Pinski wrote:

On 8/17/07, Stephen M. Kenton <skenton@ou.edu> wrote:
Cross compiling works for me out of the box if done correctly.  Yes I
have to compile GCC and glibc (or newlib) twice but I don't care as it
is all scripted.
Thanks, Andrew Pinski

Great! Scripting is wonderful and I don't object to multiple cycles either. Care to hit me with a clue-bat and post your script so I can find what I did wrong? It sound's like other people have "out-of-the-box" problems too. I'll patch my scripts and turn them loose on ~20 tool chain builds.

Steve

References:
- Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?
  - From: Stephen M. Kenton
- Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]