This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR179 reopened (was it ever fixed?)
- From: "Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:22:06 +0100
- Subject: Re: PR179 reopened (was it ever fixed?)
- References: <6c33472e0708160318g5cbc18a0k33612f1ccb54e2e6@mail.gmail.com>
On 16/08/07, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If we comment out foo(&i); then we do give a warning. I would like to
> understand what is going on. So I dumped the gimple and SSA trees for
> the original and the commented out version (uninit-B2).
Oops! In the dumps attached I did not commented out foo(&i), I just
used foo(i) instead. With that minimal change we do get a warning.
Sorry for the confusion.
Cheers,
Manuel.