This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Address of template function bug (was: Overload resolution compilation error)
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'Rodolfo Lima'" <rodolfo at rodsoft dot org>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 12:01:39 +0100
- Subject: RE: Address of template function bug (was: Overload resolution compilation error)
- References: <f8nr83$rmm$1@sea.gmane.org> <f95s8r$dt3$1@sea.gmane.org>
On 06 August 2007 02:13, Rodolfo Lima wrote:
> Rodolfo Schulz de Lima escreveu:
>> Dave Korn escreveu:
>>> Thanks, and do drop a note back with a summary of what you find out over
>>> there when you're done; if there's definitely a bug in gcc's
>>> understanding of the resolution rules, obviously we'd like to open a PR
>>> and get it fixed.
>>
>> I think we have finally a consensus at
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/browse_thread/thread/52
087a72bdc5de5a
>
> Hi, I'd like some feedback on this thread because if it's really a bug,
> I'd fill a bug report.
Yes, please go ahead and file a bug report in the GCC bugzilla.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Include the testcase and link to the above thread. This way, it will come
to the attention of the C++ maintainers, who can verify the arguments for
accepting it. The fact that MSVC and Comeau both accept it very much suggests
that this is indeed a genuine problem in GCC, but nobody will be upset if this
turns out to be a false alarm; bug reports are all screened and verified after
receiving them.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....