Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category

[Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>]

David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>>>> Diego Novillo writes:
>>>>>>             
>
> Diego> I've always found the term Non-Autopoiesis too pretentious and
> Diego> unnecessarily complex.  In a recent thread, Tobias Schluter proposed
> Diego> Non-autonomous, which is at least more readily understandable.
>
> Diego> Would this patch be OK?  Any other suggestions for a better category
> Diego> name?  Is anyone violently opposed to changing the category name?
>
> 	Kenny discovered a different name, but he hasn't publicized the
> recommendation yet.  I agree that non-autopoisis is too "cute".
>
> David
>
>   
I really do not like the current name either, but i do not have a better
one.

diego's suggestion is ok. i guess it at least satisfies the criteria of
being a well known word.

kenny