This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:36:28 -0400
- Subject: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category
I've always found the term Non-Autopoiesis too pretentious and
unnecessarily complex. In a recent thread, Tobias Schluter proposed
Non-autonomous, which is at least more readily understandable.
Would this patch be OK? Any other suggestions for a better category
name? Is anyone violently opposed to changing the category name?
--- ../MAINTAINERS (revision 126951)
+++ ../MAINTAINERS (working copy)
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
maintainers need approval to check in algorithmic changes or changes
outside of the parts of the compiler they maintain.
- Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers
+ Non-Autonomous Maintainers
dataflow Daniel Berlin firstname.lastname@example.org
dataflow Paolo Bonzini email@example.com
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
Note that individuals who maintain parts of the compiler as
-non-autopoiesis maintainers need approval changes outside of the parts
+non-autonomous maintainers need approval changes outside of the parts
of the compiler they maintain and also need approval for their own