This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Question about use of sizetype in i386.c declared in stor-layout.c

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: Kai Tietz <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:22:34 +0200
Subject: Re: Question about use of sizetype in i386.c declared in stor-layout.c
References: <OFF1C001E2.A79E57E7-ONC1257321.0047FC85-C1257321.00489D09@onevision.de>

Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com> writes:

> may this is a stupid question, but why is the type "sizetype" used in 
> i386.c as a pointer type equivalent in TARGET_64BIT case ? The variable 
> "sizetype" has SImode, but on 64-bit I would expected DImode instead.

sizetype is defined from SIZE_TYPE, which is "long unsigned int" for
TARGET_64BIT.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about use of sizetype in i386.c declared in stor-layout.c
  - From: Kai Tietz

References:
- Question about use of sizetype in i386.c declared in stor-layout.c
  - From: Kai Tietz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]