This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFH: GPLv3

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: "Doug Gregor" <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>, "Basile STARYNKEVITCH" <basile at starynkevitch dot net>, "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 12 Jul 2007 10:57:23 -0500
Subject: Re: RFH: GPLv3
References: <4695B50B.6050108@codesourcery.com> <469623AA.3010903@starynkevitch.net> <24b520d20707120729m1f6f6586meede49a8e830ae84@mail.gmail.com> <200707121434.l6CEYcQ31608@makai.watson.ibm.com>

David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:

| >>>>> Doug Gregor writes:
| 
| Doug> Could we ask the SC to reconsider the change in the GCC major version
| Doug> numbering for GPLv3? Or, at the very least, explain why it is
| Doug> important to change the major version number for a mere license
| Doug> change?
| 
| 	To avoid confusion among GCC users who do not expect a bug fix
| release to introuduce a new license.

then, let's close the tree.  It is far less confusing than the
proposed renaming scheme.

-- Gaby

References:
- RFH: GPLv3
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFH: GPLv3
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH
- Re: RFH: GPLv3
  - From: Doug Gregor
- Re: RFH: GPLv3
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]