This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: no_new_pseudos
On Jul 9, 2007, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
>> On Jul 9, 2007, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Or tell us how you think my patch should be changed.
>>
>> #define no_new_pseudos (reload_in_progress || reload_completed)
>>
>> if you want to reword it into a functional macro without a negative,
>> then it would take modifying back-ends as well. If so, I guess
>> s,no_new_pseudos,can_gen_reg_rtx (),g or can_gen_new_pseudos() would
>> do.
> OK, what do you think of this patch?
Looks good to me, thanks.
> Note that I spent less time writing this patch than I did replying to
> the e-mail messages on this thread.
Yes, it's frustrating, but my experience has been that getting
consensus is generally much more difficult than implementing an
agreed-upon solution :-(
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}