This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal
- From: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: "Rob1weld at aol dot com" <Rob1weld at aol dot com>
- Cc: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 16:29:17 -0400
- Subject: Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal
- References: <email@example.com>
On 7/7/07, Rob1weld@aol.com <Rob1weld@aol.com> wrote:
>2007/4/10, Diego Novillo <firstname.lastname@example.org_ (mailto:email@example.com)
>Following up on the recent discussion about GIMPLE tuples
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg01126.html) ), we have summarized
>our main ideas and implementation proposal in the attached document.
>This should be enough to get the implementation going, but there will be
>many details that still need to be addressed.
>Thoughts/comments on the proposal?
I read your document _http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-04/msg00290/tuples.pdf_
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-04/msg00290/tuples.pdf) with great interest.
This page _http://deputy.cs.berkeley.edu/_ (http://deputy.cs.berkeley.edu/)
has a link to this document _http://hal.cs.berkeley.edu/cil/_
which describes a means to obtain three-address code here
_http://hal.cs.berkeley.edu/cil/ext.html#toc24_ (http://hal.cs.berkeley.edu/cil/ext.html#toc24) .
If you ask nicely they would let you use CIL's code in GCC ;) .
You know that CIL is written in OCAML, right?