This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: A reload inheritance bug


Mark Shinwell wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Mark Shinwell wrote:
Do you think it should be the case that, at the point below, _any_ reload
with reg_rtx corresponding to a hard register should have the relevant
bit set in reload_spill_index?

I think so. I'm attaching a patch below. It appears to have no effect on all code I've tried - does it fix your test case?

As noted before, this does fix the test case; I've now regtested it on arm-none-eabi and there are no regressions. Do you want to take care of applying it?

Thanks for testing. I bootstrapped and regression tested it on i686-linux and committed it as 126415. I'll put it on the 4.2 and 4.1 branches in a week or so.



Bernd -- This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers. Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368 Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]