This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: no_new_pseudos
On Jul 5, 2007, Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com> wrote:
> The work here is not changing the bits. the work here is the actual
> auditing of each place to see if it was the correct place.
Then I guess the best option is to leave no_new_pseudos defined as a
macro, such that we can introduce the enumeration and migrate to it in
a way that makes it clear what has been migrated and what hasn't.
We might want to take GDB's practice of adding DEPRECATED_ to
deprecated constructs, such that people who stumble across the code
are more likely to notice that it needs auditing and updating.
Certainly replacing no_new_pseudos with a potentially-legitimate
replacement will not help mark locations that need auditing.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}