This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: dnovillo at google dot com
Cc: ebotcazou at adacore dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:06:14 EDT
Subject: Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate
References: <200707041129.01890.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <468BAF82.3020904@google.com> <200707050024.19548.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <468C3DAA.6050703@google.com>

> Also, we need to update the GIMPLE grammar so that ARRAY_REF and
> ARRAY_RANGE_REF take the appropriate values:

A minor comment is that operand 2 of COMPONENT_REF needs the same handling.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]