gcc archive
date index for July, 2007

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

July 31, 2007
23:45 Re: [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph Diego Novillo
22:10 Re: [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph Jan Hubicka
21:40 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Jan Hubicka
19:11 [tuples] Mainline merge Diego Novillo
17:39 Re: paranoia on PowerPC Segher Boessenkool
17:24 Address of template function bug (was: Overload resolution compilation error) Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
15:42 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Diego Novillo
15:06 Re: [RFC] Improve Tree-SSA if-conversion - convergence of efforts Michael Matz
15:01 Re: [RFC] Improve Tree-SSA if-conversion - convergence of efforts Daniel Berlin
13:46 [RFC] Improve Tree-SSA if-conversion - convergence of efforts Tehila Meyzels
11:16 FONTOS zolex
11:14 AspeCt-oriented C (ACC) Release V 0.7 mwgong
07:25 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Kai Tietz
04:08 test message topgunis at sbcglobal dot net

July 30, 2007
23:36 Semicolons at the end of member function definitions Volker Reichelt
22:40 gcc-4.1-20070730 is now available gccadmin
21:29 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Nicolas Alt
19:15 Re: Should gcc/DEV-PHASE in gcc 4.2 branch be updated? Mark Mitchell
17:50 Re: Bootstrap error on i686-pc-linux-gnu Andreas Meier
17:01 Re: delete LIBCALL note after split Ian Lance Taylor
16:31 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Diego Novillo
16:28 Re: Dumping tree with no opt flag Diego Novillo
16:08 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
15:41 Re: Dumping tree with no opt flag Emmanuel Fleury
15:29 Re: Dumping tree with no opt flag Diego Novillo
15:22 Dumping tree with no opt flag Emmanuel Fleury
14:21 delete LIBCALL note after split Sa Liu
13:36 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
12:42 Re: "Proceedings of the GCC Developers' Summit" now available Diego Novillo
12:42 Re: Bootstrap error on i686-pc-linux-gnu Andreas Schwab
11:59 gcj-4.3.0-9 Jack Howarth
11:58 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Diego Novillo
11:55 Bootstrap error on i686-pc-linux-gnu Andreas Meier
10:37 Re: CSE removing a load that is necessary Pranav Bhandarkar
06:48 Re: Refactoring tool ori bar
04:37 Re: How to activate instruction scheduling in GCC? Ian Lance Taylor
01:58 How to activate instruction scheduling in GCC? petruk_gile
00:04 Should gcc/DEV-PHASE in gcc 4.2 branch be updated? H.J. Lu

July 29, 2007
23:38 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Ben Elliston
23:08 RE: CSE removing a load that is necessary Dave Korn
17:40 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? Ian Lance Taylor
10:28 Re: Refactoring tool Rafael Espindola
08:21 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Eric Botcazou
06:52 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? 吴曦
05:11 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? 吴曦

July 28, 2007
21:38 Re: "Proceedings of the GCC Developers' Summit" now available Gerald Pfeifer
19:47 You introduced a memory leak with the IPA-SSA stuff Daniel Berlin
19:43 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Gerald Pfeifer
19:23 Re: gcc register allocation Ian Lance Taylor
19:21 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Dennis Clarke
19:17 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? Ian Lance Taylor
18:29 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Eric Botcazou
17:16 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? 吴曦
16:04 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? Ian Lance Taylor
15:19 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? 吴曦
07:16 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? 吴曦
06:40 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? Ramana Radhakrishnan
06:35 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Jim Blandy
05:14 gcc register allocation Purll, Duncan
05:11 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? 吴曦

July 27, 2007
22:44 gcc-4.3-20070727 is now available gccadmin
22:33 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Gerald Pfeifer
21:25 RFC: RTL sharing between decls and instructions Richard Sandiford
21:19 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Phil Edwards
21:11 Updated ecj.jar Tom Tromey
18:33 RE: Help required on use of gcc on SFU 3.5 Mayank Kumar
18:12 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Dennis Clarke
17:52 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Jim Wilson
17:50 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Dennis Clarke
17:43 Re: CSE removing a load that is necessary Pranav Bhandarkar
17:26 Re: CSE removing a load that is necessary Ian Lance Taylor
17:19 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Eric Botcazou
17:18 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Diego Novillo
17:07 CSE removing a load that is necessary Pranav Bhandarkar
17:01 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Ian Lance Taylor
16:50 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:46 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Dennis Clarke
16:39 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Ken Raeburn
16:33 Bootstrap broken on i386-pc-mingw32; ICE while building libgfortran François-Xavier Coudert
16:26 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list. Too many mailinglists? Unified mailing list? J.C. Pizarro
16:03 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list. Too many mailinglists? Unified mailing list? Joe Buck
15:57 Re: "Proceedings of the GCC Developers' Summit" now available Diego Novillo
15:56 Re: How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? Ian Lance Taylor
15:56 Re: GPLv3 in LTO and GIMPLE branches ya? Diego Novillo
15:55 Re: "Proceedings of the GCC Developers' Summit" now available Joe Buck
15:53 GPLv3 in LTO and GIMPLE branches ya? J.C. Pizarro
15:49 Re: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Ian Lance Taylor
15:27 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Manuel López-Ibáñez
15:27 Re: "Proceedings of the GCC Developers' Summit" now available Diego Novillo
15:15 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
14:22 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list. Too many mailinglists? Unified mailing list? J.C. Pizarro
13:58 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Zdenek Dvorak
13:51 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:29 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:26 Re: [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph Aldy Hernandez
13:17 How to make use of instruction scheduling to improve performance? 吴曦
13:03 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Tim Prince
12:54 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Diego Novillo
12:27 "Proceedings of the GCC Developers' Summit" now available Ron Chen
11:33 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Richard Kenner
11:31 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Richard Kenner
11:27 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Richard Guenther
11:21 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Richard Kenner
10:26 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Manuel López-Ibáñez
10:15 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Gabriel Dos Reis
10:01 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Richard Smith
09:30 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Robert Dewar
07:19 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Gabriel Dos Reis
06:24 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Paolo Bonzini
05:54 RE: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. compiler produces wrong binary for wrong processor Dennis Clarke
04:12 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Laurent GUERBY
02:51 Re: [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph Jan Hubicka

July 26, 2007
23:38 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Richard Smith
23:21 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Doug Gregor
22:54 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Ian Lance Taylor
22:25 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Richard Smith
22:02 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Joe Buck
21:59 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Ian Lance Taylor
21:37 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list David Daney
21:31 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category DJ Delorie
21:23 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Kenneth Zadeck
21:19 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list DJ Delorie
21:13 Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Diego Novillo
21:11 [tuples] meaning of DECL_SAVED_TREE while analyzing cgraph Aldy Hernandez
21:05 Re: Creating gcc-newbies mailing list Andrew Pinski
20:22 Re: Remove ARM AOF support John Tytgat
20:15 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Ian Lance Taylor
19:59 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category David Edelsohn
19:57 Re: GCC with formal testing docs DJ Delorie
19:49 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Gabriel Dos Reis
19:45 Re: RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Gerald Pfeifer
19:37 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Ian Lance Taylor
18:36 RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category Diego Novillo
18:28 RE: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. Anyone know why ? Dennis Clarke
18:19 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Doug Gregor
18:04 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Richard Smith
17:41 Remove ARM AOF support Paul Brook
15:04 Re: C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Doug Gregor
14:46 C++ ABI: name mangling of operator new [bug 6057] Richard Smith
14:36 Re: Enabling gcc optimization pass Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:29 Re: Enabling gcc optimization pass Diego Novillo
13:55 Re: Enabling gcc optimization pass Diego Novillo
12:58 Re: Enabling gcc optimization pass Rohit Arul Raj
12:32 Re: relocation truncated to fit Canqun Yang
12:21 Re: Enabling gcc optimization pass Basile STARYNKEVITCH
11:27 Re: dlopen() crash -gcc 3.4.6 20060404 J.C. Pizarro
10:56 Re: URGENT : elf_update - low performance with large files ? (fwd) Ben Elliston
10:54 Re: dlopen() crash -gcc 3.4.6 20060404 Ben Elliston
10:46 Re: URGENT : elf_update - low performance with large files ? (fwd) J.C. Pizarro
10:19 Re: relocation truncated to fit Richard Guenther
10:02 relocation truncated to fit Canqun Yang
09:42 Re: dlopen() crash -gcc 3.4.6 20060404 Anitha Boyapati
09:41 RE: Enabling gcc optimization pass Dave Korn
09:39 RE: GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. Anyone know why ? Dave Korn
08:51 dlopen() crash -gcc 3.4.6 20060404 Gaurav Kheterpal
08:21 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:30 Enabling gcc optimization pass Rohit Arul Raj
03:12 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Ben Elliston
03:09 Re: GCC for Symbian Ben Elliston
02:09 GCC 4.2.1 : bootstrap fails at stage 2. Anyone know why ? Dennis Clarke

July 25, 2007
23:11 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
22:52 Re: gcc-4.2.1 pointer questions? Volker Reichelt
22:51 Re: Rebuild GCC 4.2 Ben Elliston
20:28 gcc-4.2.1 pointer questions? Brian D. McGrew
19:42 Re: Bug 32346 David A. Greene
19:40 Bug 32346 David A. Greene
18:52 Re: URGENT : elf_update - low performance with large files ? (fwd) Joe Buck
18:50 Re: URGENT : elf_update - low performance with large files ? (fwd) J.C. Pizarro
18:39 Re: URGENT : elf_update - low performance with large files ? (fwd) Joe Buck
18:32 Re: URGENT : elf_update - low performance with large files ? (fwd) J.C. Pizarro
18:24 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Robert Dewar
17:05 RE: URGENT : elf_update - low performance with large files ? (fwd) Dave Korn
17:04 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Joe Buck
16:59 Re: URGENT : elf_update - low performance with large files ? (fwd) Joe Buck
13:11 Re: Rebuild GCC 4.2 Tim Prince
12:06 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms Richard Guenther
11:05 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Robert Dewar
10:27 URGENT : elf_update - low performance with large files ? (fwd) Anitha Boyapati
08:02 Re: Rebuild GCC 4.2 Manuel López-Ibáñez
07:40 Re: GCC with formal testing docs 张飞
06:29 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms Paolo Bonzini
04:29 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Ben Elliston
03:22 Rebuild GCC 4.2 S.SRIDHAR
00:48 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms tbp

July 24, 2007
22:53 Re: debugging info considered harmful to lto. Jan Hubicka
19:10 Re: debugging info considered harmful to lto. Kenneth Zadeck
19:01 Re: debugging info considered harmful to lto. Jason Merrill
18:47 Re: paranoia on PowerPC Joel Sherrill
18:33 Re: bootstrap broken on trunk r126866 Thomas Koenig
18:10 Re: SH2A: "RTV/N Rn" implementation Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:42 Re: paranoia on PowerPC Joern Rennecke
16:15 inappropriate disclaimers (Was: Re: Installing gcc-3.2) Joern Rennecke
16:06 Re: paranoia on PowerPC Joel Sherrill
14:40 [tuples] Mainline merge (@126872) Diego Novillo
13:06 Re: paranoia on PowerPC Tim Prince
12:34 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms Richard Guenther
10:52 RE: GCC with formal testing docs Dave Korn
10:12 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Anitha Boyapati
10:05 RE: SH2A: "RTV/N Rn" implementation Naveen H.S.
09:48 Re: GCC with formal testing docs Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:23 bootstrap broken on trunk r126866 Thomas Veith
09:12 BB_RTL flag assertion on basic_block-s when dump_bb_info (and compiler probe) Basile STARYNKEVITCH
06:42 GCC with formal testing docs 张飞
06:24 Re: paranoia on PowerPC Ralf Corsepius
03:39 MacOS X Ada patches? Jack Howarth
02:00 Re: paranoia on PowerPC Tim Prince

July 23, 2007
23:34 Re: paranoia on PowerPC Joel Sherrill
23:19 Re: paranoia on PowerPC Andrew Pinski
22:54 paranoia on PowerPC Joel Sherrill
22:41 gcc-4.1-20070723 is now available gccadmin
19:50 Re: -Warray-bounds issue Diego Novillo
19:45 Re: -Warray-bounds issue Matt Hargett
19:02 Re: debugging info considered harmful to lto. Daniel Jacobowitz
18:58 Re: Installing gcc-3.2 Ian Lance Taylor
18:56 Re: debugging info considered harmful to lto. Jan Hubicka
18:55 Re: -Warray-bounds issue Diego Novillo
18:45 -Warray-bounds issue Matt Hargett
18:26 RE: Installing gcc-3.2 Dave Korn
18:23 Re: Compiler support for write barrier insertion ? Ian Lance Taylor
18:13 Re: Installing gcc-3.2 Ian Lance Taylor
17:50 Re: debugging info considered harmful to lto. Daniel Jacobowitz
17:37 Re: top-level configure Ralf Wildenhues
17:33 Re: debugging info considered harmful to lto. Jan Hubicka
15:58 Re: FRE - SCCVN problem with initialized global variables Andreas Krebbel
15:43 Re: Compiler support for write barrier insertion ? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:30 Re: Compiler support for write barrier insertion ? Andrew Haley
15:23 Compiler support for write barrier insertion ? Dmitry Antipov
14:14 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer H.J. Lu
13:36 Re: Question about use of sizetype in i386.c declared in stor-layout.c Andreas Schwab
13:28 Re: Question about use of sizetype in i386.c declared in stor-layout.c Kai Tietz
13:22 Re: Question about use of sizetype in i386.c declared in stor-layout.c Andreas Schwab
13:13 Question about use of sizetype in i386.c declared in stor-layout.c Kai Tietz
12:19 Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations) Sunzir Deepur
12:16 Re: debugging info considered harmful to lto. Daniel Jacobowitz
11:59 Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations) Robert Dewar
11:39 Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations) Diego Novillo
11:07 Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations) Sunzir Deepur
09:46 RE: [Fwd: Re: Problem compiling NONMEM with mingw gfortran 4.3.0 builds] Dave Korn

July 22, 2007
23:37 debugging info considered harmful to lto. Kenneth Zadeck
21:53 GCC for Symbian Evgeniy Filatov
21:46 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer Gerald Pfeifer
12:32 Re: Refactoring tool Robert Dewar
12:28 Refactoring tool Patrick Flannery
11:25 Re: assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations) Robert Dewar
10:50 assembly: control flow graphs (and optimizations) Sunzir Deepur
09:57 Re: Fw: Failing matrix tests Razya Ladelsky

July 21, 2007
20:34 top-level configure Ben Elliston
19:56 GCC 4.2 branch open Mark Mitchell
17:20 [Fwd: Re: Problem compiling NONMEM with mingw gfortran 4.3.0 builds] Jerry DeLisle
13:33 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms tbp

July 20, 2007
22:43 gcc-4.3-20070720 is now available gccadmin
22:13 Re: Loop optimizations cheatsheet Zdenek Dvorak
21:50 RE: Loop optimizations cheatsheet Jagasia, Harsha
21:25 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Ling-hua Tseng
20:45 Loop optimizations cheatsheet Zdenek Dvorak
19:31 summary of the loop-optimizations BOF Dorit Nuzman
15:38 RE: Overload resolution compilation error Dave Korn
15:32 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
14:19 Re: iit bombay workshop link Diego Novillo
14:00 RE: Overload resolution compilation error Dave Korn
13:58 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
13:39 iit bombay workshop link Ramana Radhakrishnan
12:40 ICE: in explow.c:326 while compiling libgfortan Kai Tietz
11:19 Re: Difficulties compiling under Irix... Philippe Schaffnit
09:42 Re: Difficulties compiling under Irix... Philippe Schaffnit
09:37 Re: Difficulties compiling under Irix... Richard Sandiford
09:31 Re: Installing gcc-3.2 Ben Elliston
08:03 Re: Difficulties compiling under Irix... Philippe Schaffnit
07:53 Re: Difficulties compiling under Irix... Janne Blomqvist
06:06 Installing gcc-3.2 Venkatesan Jeevanandam
01:12 std::string::operator==/!= optimization Jari Sundell
00:55 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Ling-hua Tseng
00:19 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Rodolfo Lima

July 19, 2007
23:42 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Ling-hua Tseng
22:26 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Rodolfo Lima
21:32 RE: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms Dave Korn
20:32 Re: gcc for Intel 8086 family Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
20:21 [wwwdocs] PATCH for Re: GCC 4.1 status on front page Gerald Pfeifer
19:38 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms tbp
19:27 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms tbp
19:26 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Ling-hua Tseng
19:15 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms Richard Guenther
18:59 RE: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms Dave Korn
18:53 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms Joel Dice
18:31 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms tbp
17:47 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
17:32 Re: Overload resolution compilation error Ling-hua Tseng
16:33 Re: g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms Richard Guenther
16:15 Overload resolution compilation error Rodolfo Schulz de Lima
15:45 Re: Templates + Inheritance problem Ling-hua Tseng
15:42 Re: Templates + Inheritance problem Ling-hua Tseng
15:29 Re: problem about generating data section in g++ 4.2 Ling-hua Tseng
15:26 Templates + Inheritance problem John Gateley
15:06 RE: gcc for Intel 8086 family Dave Korn
15:01 Re: gcc for Intel 8086 family Daniel Verkamp
14:41 gcc for Intel 8086 family Indu Bhagat
13:44 Re: Fw: Failing matrix tests David Edelsohn
13:07 g++ 4.3, troubles with C++ indexing idioms tbp
12:14 Re: problem about generating data section in g++ 4.2 Brian Dessent
11:30 problem about generating data section in g++ 4.2 Ling-hua Tseng
10:51 Re: Fw: Failing matrix tests Razya Ladelsky
10:23 Re: -dv -fdump-rtl-all question Sunzir Deepur
03:53 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Daniel Berlin
03:08 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Richard Guenther

July 18, 2007
21:04 Fortran benchmark for vectorizer Andrew Pinski
19:07 Re: FRE - SCCVN problem with initialized global variables Daniel Berlin
17:36 auto increment in simple mac loop is not created. Tal Agmon
17:16 Re: Error referencing symbols in gdb when compiled with gcc 3.4.6 Michael Eager
16:54 FRE - SCCVN problem with initialized global variables Andreas Krebbel
16:10 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Richard Henderson
15:05 Re: -dv -fdump-rtl-all question Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
12:24 Error referencing symbols in gdb when compiled with gcc 3.4.6 Kalpana Ramamurthy
10:38 Re: Execute test fails in gcc testsuite Pranav Bhandarkar
08:44 Re: SH2A: "RTV/N Rn" implementation Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:32 -dv -fdump-rtl-all question Sunzir Deepur
06:44 RE: SH2A: "RTV/N Rn" implementation Naveen H.S.
06:39 Execute test fails in gcc testsuite Venkatesan Jeevanandam
03:39 4.2 branch frozen for release Mark Mitchell
01:27 You've received a greeting ecard from a Family member! Postcard.com

July 17, 2007
17:27 GPL exception for fptr.c and milli64.s Mark Mitchell
15:37 plugin branch initial commit Eric Christopher
13:46 Re: Efficiently encoding a hierarchy Diego Novillo
13:23 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Krzysztof Halasa
12:17 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
12:11 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
09:53 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Wolfram Gloger
09:45 Re: SH2A: "RTV/N Rn" implementation Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:56 Re: kind of regression -fprofile-* between r126538 and r126587 Thomas Veith
07:45 SH2A: "RTV/N Rn" implementation Naveen H.S.
05:23 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
00:54 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
00:09 Re: kind of regression -fprofile-* between r126538 and r126587 Andrew Pinski
00:02 Re: kind of regression -fprofile-* between r126538 and r126587 Janis Johnson

July 16, 2007
23:24 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Richard Henderson
22:39 gcc-4.1-20070716 is now available gccadmin
22:14 Re: [tuples] Renaming GS to GIMPLE Aldy Hernandez
20:57 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
20:40 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
19:45 GCC 4.1 status on front page Jonathan Wakely
19:43 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Laurent GUERBY
19:13 [tuples] Renaming GS to GIMPLE Diego Novillo
18:46 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
18:43 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
18:33 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
18:30 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
18:28 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
18:21 RE: RFH: GPLv3 Dave Korn
18:13 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
18:10 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
18:01 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
17:58 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
17:51 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
17:50 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
17:44 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
17:36 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Geoffrey Keating
17:13 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
16:55 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
16:39 Basic frontend framework: Segfault on append_to_statement_list Rehno Lindeque
16:21 Re: ICE building libgcc2.c for MIPS, too Ian Lance Taylor
16:06 Re: GCC 4.2.1 RC1 Clemens Koller
15:53 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Diego Novillo
15:45 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
15:44 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
15:44 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
15:33 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:32 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
15:31 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:30 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
15:28 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:28 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
15:24 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:23 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
15:20 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:18 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
15:14 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
15:12 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
15:11 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
15:04 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
15:03 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
14:48 RE: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
14:47 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Richard Guenther
14:46 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
14:39 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Wolfram Gloger
14:24 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
14:19 RE: RFH: GPLv3 Dave Korn
13:32 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
13:06 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
13:05 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Krzysztof Halasa
12:58 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
12:52 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
12:49 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
09:44 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Nick Clifton
06:43 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Basile STARYNKEVITCH
01:00 Re: valid_gimple_expression_p claims validity of invalid gimple Daniel Berlin

July 15, 2007
22:31 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? H.J. Lu
22:10 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Laurent GUERBY
21:38 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Janne Blomqvist
20:11 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
20:04 Re: Re[2]: [GSoC: DDG export][RFC] Current status Zdenek Dvorak
19:52 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Richard Guenther
19:36 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Florian Weimer
17:34 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
17:11 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
15:04 Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Diego Novillo
15:01 Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Andrew Pinski
14:17 Re: RFH: GPLv3 and release version numbers Laurent GUERBY
13:45 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Brooks Moses
13:37 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
13:33 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
13:32 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
13:28 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
13:11 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
13:08 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? H.J. Lu
13:03 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
13:01 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
13:00 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
12:55 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
12:40 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
12:32 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
12:24 Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7 Dominique Dhumieres
07:18 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Janne Blomqvist
06:46 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Brooks Moses
06:32 Fw: Failing matrix tests Ayal Zaks
04:18 Re: ICE building libgcc2.c for MIPS, too Adam Nemet
03:08 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Rob Brown
02:54 Re: ICE building libgcc2.c for MIPS, too Sandra Loosemore
02:36 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Rob Brown
00:25 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
00:00 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Krzysztof Halasa

July 14, 2007
23:46 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
23:36 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Krzysztof Halasa
23:20 Efficiently encoding a hierarchy Kannan Goundan
22:50 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
22:17 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
18:37 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
16:20 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? H.J. Lu
16:14 FAIL: gcc.dg/pragma-darwin.c Dominique Dhumieres
16:03 Re: Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? Tobias Schlüter
16:00 Can realloc be marked as a mallloc-like function? H.J. Lu
15:23 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Krzysztof Halasa
11:33 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
11:15 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Richard Kenner
08:18 make clean-target fails at x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libjava Manuel López-Ibáñez
08:07 Re: valid_gimple_expression_p claims validity of invalid gimple Eric Botcazou
03:43 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
02:16 valid_gimple_expression_p claims validity of invalid gimple Daniel Berlin
02:01 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Brooks Moses

July 13, 2007
23:55 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Jim Wilson
23:05 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Marcus Meissner
23:03 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Jim Wilson
22:43 gcc-4.3-20070713 is now available gccadmin
22:30 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Rob Brown
22:01 Re: incremental compiler project Mike Stump
21:41 GCC 4.2.1 RC2 Mark Mitchell
21:24 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
21:23 incremental compiler project Tom Tromey
21:21 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
21:07 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
20:28 Dbase Files Bansal, Mahendra
19:56 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Geoffrey Keating
18:41 Re: Re[2]: [GSoC: DDG export][RFC] Current status Alexander Monakov
18:26 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Clemens Koller
16:55 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Russ Allbery
14:30 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Joel Sherrill
14:13 Re: abs insn with QI and HI mode Ying Yi
14:06 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
12:21 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
12:14 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Nicholas Nethercote
11:36 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
10:26 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
09:30 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Nick Clifton
09:22 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Nicholas Nethercote
07:53 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
07:42 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
07:36 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Alexandre Oliva
04:27 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Daniel Berlin
04:11 [PATCH] Modulo-scheduling improvements. Patch 1 of 2. - A status update Revital1 Eres

July 12, 2007
22:41 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Andrew Pinski
22:37 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Michael Eager
21:49 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Eric Botcazou
21:25 Trouble with powerpc64 mfpgpr patch Greg McGary
21:20 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Richard Kenner
21:17 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Eric Botcazou
21:10 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Brooks Moses
21:05 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Richard Kenner
21:00 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Eric Botcazou
20:47 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Richard Kenner
19:56 Re: GCC 4.2.1 Status Report (2007-07-10) Daniel Berlin
19:46 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
19:34 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Michael Eager
19:30 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Guenther
19:29 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Eric Botcazou
19:20 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Michael Eager
19:15 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Michael Eager
19:08 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Mike Stump
19:08 Regarding bug 32505 ori bar
19:05 Re: GCC 4.2.1 Status Report (2007-07-10) John David Anglin
18:59 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Ian Lance Taylor
18:54 kind of regression -fprofile-* between r126538 and r126587 Thomas Veith
18:50 Re: Test gcc.c-torture/execute/align-3.c Geoffrey Keating
18:49 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Ian Lance Taylor
18:45 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Ian Lance Taylor
18:19 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Robert Dewar
18:05 RE: RFH: GPLv3 Janis Johnson
17:47 RE: RFH: GPLv3 Dave Korn
17:45 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Brooks Moses
17:44 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:41 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
17:41 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Janis Johnson
17:29 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Gressett
17:28 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Brooks Moses
17:21 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Brooks Moses
17:21 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Mark Mitchell
17:17 RE: RFH: GPLv3 Dave Korn
17:17 Re: RFH: GPLv3 R. D. Flowers, Chattanooga TN
17:16 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
17:15 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Mark Mitchell
17:15 RE: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Dave Korn
17:10 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Serge Belyshev
17:00 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Ian Lance Taylor
16:56 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Ian Lance Taylor
16:54 Re: RFH: GPLv3 DJ Delorie
16:53 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Joern Rennecke
16:50 Re: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Andrew Pinski
16:38 RE: Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Dave Korn
16:33 Failing matrix tests Steve Ellcey
16:24 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Mark Mitchell
16:23 Host/Target confusion in Dwarf output Michael Eager
16:13 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Meissner
16:10 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
16:03 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Daniel Jacobowitz
16:02 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
16:01 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Michael Eager
16:01 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:59 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
15:56 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
15:54 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Bernd Schmidt
15:53 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Gabriel Dos Reis
15:51 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Benjamin Smedberg
15:50 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
15:48 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:46 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:45 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:44 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Diego Novillo
15:42 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Benjamin Kosnik
15:41 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Benjamin Smedberg
15:41 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Kenner
15:40 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
15:37 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Benjamin Smedberg
15:30 Re: Test gcc.c-torture/execute/align-3.c Steve Ellcey
15:28 RE: Major Differences between gcc4.2 and gcc3.3 Dave Korn
15:26 Major Differences between gcc4.2 and gcc3.3 Mayank Kumar
15:19 RE: RFH: GPLv3 Dave Korn
15:19 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
15:11 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:06 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Doug Gregor
15:05 RE: RFH: GPLv3 Dave Korn
14:52 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
14:51 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
14:50 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Doug Gregor
14:45 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Ian Lance Taylor
14:40 Re: GDB testsuite + dejagnu uses gcc compiler by default, how to configure testsuite to use other 'c' compilers (like cross compilers arm-cc, etc) Ian Lance Taylor
14:37 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Ian Lance Taylor
14:36 RE: RFH: GPLv3 Dave Korn
14:34 Re: RFH: GPLv3 David Edelsohn
14:29 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Doug Gregor
12:50 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Basile STARYNKEVITCH
11:17 Re: Bootstrap broken on trunk rev. 126573 Kai Tietz
10:04 New bootstrap failure ppc64 Diego Novillo
09:56 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Nick Clifton
09:50 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Richard Guenther
09:33 Re: RFH: GPLv3 Gabriel Dos Reis
09:15 FW: GDB testsuite + dejagnu uses gcc compiler by default, how to configure testsuite to use other 'c' compilers (like cross compilers arm-cc, etc) Venkatesan Jeevanandam
09:14 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Kai Tietz
09:13 GDB testsuite + dejagnu uses gcc compiler by default, how to configure testsuite to use other 'c' compilers (like cross compilers arm-cc, etc) Venkatesan Jeevanandam
08:44 Bootstrap broken on trunk rev. 126573 Thomas Veith
08:34 RE: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Dave Korn
04:59 RFH: GPLv3 Mark Mitchell
04:20 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Rob1weld
00:15 Re: Test gcc.c-torture/execute/align-3.c David Edelsohn

July 11, 2007
23:57 Re: Test gcc.c-torture/execute/align-3.c Geoff Keating
23:49 Test gcc.c-torture/execute/align-3.c Steve Ellcey
20:46 [Fwd: error in libfortran on cygwin] Bobby McNulty
20:32 Re: ODR violation for std::cout etc. Gabriel Dos Reis
20:31 Andreas Krebbel appointed s390 co-maintainer David Edelsohn
19:52 Re: abs insn with QI and HI mode Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:36 Re: abs insn with QI and HI mode Jim Wilson
16:52 Re: -fstrict-overflow example 4.2 status Ian Lance Taylor
16:51 Re: ODR violation for std::cout etc. Benjamin Kosnik
16:11 -fstrict-overflow example 4.2 status Christian BRUEL
14:23 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Jan Hubicka
14:14 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Kai Tietz
14:10 Re: ICE building libgcc2.c for MIPS, too Ian Lance Taylor
13:26 Re: ODR violation for std::cout etc. Gabriel Dos Reis
12:12 Re: ICE building libgcc2.c for MIPS, too Sandra Loosemore
12:02 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Jan Hubicka
10:32 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Kai Tietz
09:04 Re: GCC 4.2.1 Status Report (2007-07-10) Richard Guenther
04:57 Re: GCC 4.2.1 Status Report (2007-07-10) Mark Mitchell
04:49 Re: ICE while bootstraping on ppc64. Ian Lance Taylor
04:47 Re: ICE building libgcc2.c for MIPS, too Ian Lance Taylor
04:46 Re: GCC 4.2.1 Status Report (2007-07-10) Daniel Berlin
04:09 GCC 4.2.1 Status Report (2007-07-10) Mark Mitchell
04:01 ICE building libgcc2.c for MIPS, too Sandra Loosemore
00:02 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Jan Hubicka

July 10, 2007
23:19 new events at GCC Summit Janis Johnson
22:47 Re: RFA: upcoming testsuite disruptions Geoffrey Keating
22:03 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Daniel Berlin
21:01 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Andrew Pinski
20:52 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Nicolas Alt
20:29 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Andrew Pinski
20:27 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Nicolas Alt
19:16 ICE while bootstraping on ppc64. Revital1 Eres
18:24 RFA: upcoming testsuite disruptions Janis Johnson
17:11 Re: ODR violation for std::cout etc. Joe Buck
17:02 Re: crtbegin.o crtend.o Sunzir Deepur
16:58 Re: ODR violation for std::cout etc. Paolo Carlini
16:52 Re: crtbegin.o crtend.o Ian Lance Taylor
16:43 ODR violation for std::cout etc. Michael Veksler
16:08 Re: Query regarding volatiles and store CCP. Ramana Radhakrishnan
16:05 Re: missing "std::move" Paolo Carlini
15:54 Re: Query regarding volatiles and store CCP. Richard Guenther
15:50 Query regarding volatiles and store CCP. Ramana Radhakrishnan
15:46 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Jan Hubicka
15:40 Re: missing "std::move" Paolo Carlini
15:26 missing "std::move" fafa
15:24 crtbegin.o crtend.o Sunzir Deepur
15:12 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Kai Tietz
15:09 Re: abs insn with QI and HI mode Robert Dewar
15:03 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Jan Hubicka
14:03 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Ian Lance Taylor
13:03 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Kai Tietz
12:52 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Jan Hubicka
12:44 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Kai Tietz
12:21 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Jan Hubicka
12:17 RE: Crossbuild problem x86_64-pc-mingw32 related to crtbegin & crtend Kai Tietz
11:51 Re: abs insn with QI and HI mode Richard Kenner
11:48 RE: Crossbuild problem x86_64-pc-mingw32 related to crtbegin & crtend Kai Tietz
11:42 RE: Crossbuild problem x86_64-pc-mingw32 related to crtbegin & crtend Dave Korn
11:38 RE: Crossbuild problem x86_64-pc-mingw32 related to crtbegin & crtend Kai Tietz
11:35 RE: Crossbuild problem x86_64-pc-mingw32 related to crtbegin & crtend Danny Smith
11:24 RE: Crossbuild problem x86_64-pc-mingw32 related to crtbegin & crtend Dave Korn
11:19 Crossbuild problem x86_64-pc-mingw32 related to crtbegin & crtend Kai Tietz
10:32 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Rob1weld
09:35 Re: abs insn with QI and HI mode Ying Yi

July 09, 2007
23:09 Re: abs insn with QI and HI mode Jim Wilson
22:43 gcc-4.1-20070709 is now available gccadmin
22:36 Re: Fixing jumps reachability after block reordering Jim Wilson
21:55 Re: no_new_pseudos Joe Buck
21:40 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
21:39 Reply Immediately Hamad Ocallan
21:39 Reply Immediately Hamad Ocallan
21:37 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Daniel Berlin
21:26 Re: no_new_pseudos Paolo Bonzini
21:09 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
21:08 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
20:21 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Nicolas Alt
20:19 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility Nicolas Alt
19:58 RE: AMD64 ABI compatibility Dave Korn
19:55 Re: AMD64 ABI compatibility H.J. Lu
19:48 AMD64 ABI compatibility Nicolas Alt
19:32 Re: Uncatchable exceptions on some systems. Joshua ChaitinPollak
19:09 Re: no_new_pseudos Joe Buck
19:01 Re: no_new_pseudos Eric Botcazou
18:55 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
18:55 Re: no_new_pseudos Joe Buck
18:54 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
18:53 Re: no_new_pseudos Bernd Schmidt
18:52 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
18:44 Re: no_new_pseudos Daniel Jacobowitz
18:34 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
18:32 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
18:31 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
18:29 RE: no_new_pseudos Dave Korn
18:27 Re: no_new_pseudos Mike Stump
18:26 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
18:22 Re: Uncatchable exceptions on some systems. David Daney
18:19 Re: no_new_pseudos Eric Botcazou
18:06 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
17:55 Re: Uncatchable exceptions on some systems. Joshua ChaitinPollak
17:52 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
17:50 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
17:44 Re: Uncatchable exceptions on some systems. David Daney
17:20 Uncatchable exceptions on some systems. Joshua ChaitinPollak
17:15 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
16:44 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
16:39 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Earnshaw
16:35 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
16:31 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
15:44 Re: no_new_pseudos Paolo Bonzini
15:37 Re: no_new_pseudos Andrew Pinski
15:12 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
13:51 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
13:46 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
13:32 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
13:27 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
12:06 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
11:45 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
11:35 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
07:30 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Rob1weld
05:57 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Revital1 Eres
05:42 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
02:37 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Revital1 Eres
00:49 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
00:45 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
00:17 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Steve Kargl

July 08, 2007
23:18 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Diego Novillo
19:42 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
18:47 Re: Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Richard Guenther
18:09 Re: Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:56 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
08:33 Re: Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Richard Guenther
07:19 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
01:49 Re: Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Kaveh R. GHAZI
01:31 Re: Bootstrap failure on x86 Kaz Kojima

July 07, 2007
23:30 Re: Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Joseph S. Myers
23:24 Re: Bootstrap failure on x86 Andrew Pinski
23:22 Re: Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Kaveh R. GHAZI
23:18 Bootstrap failure on x86 Kaz Kojima
21:30 Re: gcc-4.3-20070707 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
20:44 gcc-4.3-20070707 is now available gccadmin
20:29 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Daniel Berlin
19:17 Re: Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Joseph S. Myers
16:15 abs insn with QI and HI mode Ying Yi
16:10 Re: Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Kaveh R. GHAZI
15:13 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Steve Kargl
11:04 Re: RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation proposal Rob1weld
10:47 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Bernhard Fischer

July 06, 2007
22:47 gcc-4.3-20070706 is now available gccadmin
21:25 Re: Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Joseph S. Myers
21:12 Q: middle-end problem when variadic builtins promote float to double Kaveh R. GHAZI
19:57 Re: Writing to Subversion via Git Bernardo Innocenti
19:39 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Diego Novillo
19:31 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Brooks Moses
19:01 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Diego Novillo
18:20 Re: Writing to Subversion via Git Ollie Wild
18:02 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Sandiford
17:51 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
17:46 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
17:33 Re: Fixing jumps reachability after block reordering Ian Lance Taylor
17:19 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Diego Novillo
17:15 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Steve Kargl
17:09 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Steve Kargl
17:07 Re: Fixing jumps reachability after block reordering Gregory B. Prokopski
16:44 Re: RFC: Enabling DFP/libbid on dditional target (mingw32) Janis Johnson
16:17 Re: Fixing jumps reachability after block reordering Ian Lance Taylor
16:09 Re: Fixing jumps reachability after block reordering Gregory B. Prokopski
16:07 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Diego Novillo
15:53 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Ian Lance Taylor
15:48 Re: Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 FX Coudert
15:44 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Zack Weinberg
15:41 Ongoing bootstrap failures on ppc64 since 2007-07-02 Diego Novillo
15:41 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Zack Weinberg
15:27 Re: X86_64 bit shifts Michael Meissner
15:05 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
13:44 Re: A reload inheritance bug Bernd Schmidt
12:28 Re: X86_64 bit shifts Daniel Jacobowitz
12:13 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Sandiford
12:07 X86_64 bit shifts Wachdorf, Daniel R
11:46 Re: no_new_pseudos David Edelsohn
09:31 RE: RFC: Enabling DFP/libbid on dditional target (mingw32) Danny Smith
09:14 Re: RFC: Enabling DFP/libbid on dditional target (mingw32) Brian Dessent
09:04 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Richard Guenther
08:50 RFC: Enabling DFP/libbid on dditional target (mingw32) Danny Smith
08:28 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
07:34 Re: A reload inheritance bug Mark Shinwell
07:08 Re: Any interest in i586-pc-interix3 configuration improvements? Harald Dunkel
06:31 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Paolo Bonzini
02:49 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Zack Weinberg
02:03 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Andrew Pinski
01:41 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Geoff Keating
01:23 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Ian Lance Taylor
00:49 Re: Fixing jumps reachability after block reordering Ian Lance Taylor
00:45 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Zack Weinberg

July 05, 2007
23:58 Re: [MIPS] One test failed David Daney
22:50 [MIPS] One test failed Fu, Chao-Ying
22:36 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Zack Weinberg
22:30 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Andrew Pinski
22:28 Re: Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Andrew Pinski
22:22 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
21:39 Problem with std_expand_builtin_va_start on targets where sizetype and ptr_type_node don't have the same mode Zack Weinberg
21:23 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Richard Guenther
21:17 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
21:03 Fixing jumps reachability after block reordering Gregory B. Prokopski
20:55 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Richard Guenther
20:49 Re: Decimal float and the Cygwin build of GFortran. Timothy C Prince
20:49 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Daniel Berlin
20:45 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Daniel Berlin
20:37 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
20:06 Re: no_new_pseudos Joseph S. Myers
19:33 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Sandiford
19:11 Re: Bootstrap is broken on x86_64, comparison between signed and unsigned in optabs.c Sandra Loosemore
18:50 Re: Rainer Orth appointed IRIX and Tru64 UNIX maintainer Rainer Orth
18:49 Re: Bootstrap is broken on x86_64, comparison between signed and unsigned in optabs.c Uros Bizjak
18:38 Bootstrap is broken on x86_64, comparison between signed and unsigned in optabs.c Uros Bizjak
18:33 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
18:32 Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Paolo Carlini
18:29 Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Richard Guenther
18:23 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer H.J. Lu
18:22 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
18:18 Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Paolo Carlini
18:05 Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Mark Mitchell
18:00 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer Ian Lance Taylor
17:59 Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Paolo Carlini
17:59 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer Ian Lance Taylor
17:51 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer Tom Tromey
17:49 Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Mark Mitchell
17:48 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer Uros Bizjak
17:45 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer Paolo Bonzini
17:44 Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Paolo Carlini
17:42 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Richard Guenther
17:30 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
17:30 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer H.J. Lu
17:29 Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Mark Mitchell
17:19 Re: bootstrap broken on powerpc? Steve Kargl
17:10 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Richard Guenther
16:57 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
16:46 Re: PATCH: Add myself as libbid maintainer Ian Lance Taylor
16:34 Re: bootstrap broken on powerpc? Dorit Nuzman
16:21 Re: Help on emitting static constant arrays FX Coudert
16:16 RE: Decimal float and the Cygwin build of GFortran. Dave Korn
16:06 Re: Decimal float and the Cygwin build of GFortran. Joe Buck
16:05 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
15:15 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Daniel Berlin
15:12 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
15:10 Re: bootstrap broken on powerpc? Dorit Nuzman
15:09 Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Richard Guenther
15:05 flag_complex_method = 2 in C++? Paolo Carlini
14:55 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Daniel Berlin
14:47 Re: bootstrap broken on powerpc? Steve Kargl
14:10 Help on emitting static constant arrays FX Coudert
12:42 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Richard Kenner
12:32 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Richard Kenner
12:10 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Richard Guenther
11:49 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
11:37 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
11:21 Re: no_new_pseudos David Edelsohn
09:46 Re: bootstrap broken on powerpc? Dorit Nuzman
09:18 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Andrew Pinski
09:14 Re: bootstrap broken on powerpc? Revital1 Eres
09:05 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Richard Guenther
08:34 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Richard Guenther
07:25 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
07:18 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Sandiford
07:17 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
06:59 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
04:20 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Daniel Berlin
03:14 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
02:07 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
02:03 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Richard Kenner
01:44 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
01:12 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Daniel Berlin
00:58 Re: no_new_pseudos David Edelsohn
00:50 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
00:39 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Diego Novillo

July 04, 2007
23:48 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
23:24 Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline Roman Zippel
22:51 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Daniel Berlin
22:20 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
20:32 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
19:59 GCC 4.2.1 RC1 Mark Mitchell
18:41 RE: no_new_pseudos Dave Korn
18:26 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
18:09 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
17:39 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Sandiford
17:20 Re: no_new_pseudos David Edelsohn
17:15 Re: no_new_pseudos Eric Botcazou
17:10 RE: no_new_pseudos Dave Korn
17:03 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
16:49 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Sandiford
16:48 RE: no_new_pseudos Dave Korn
16:41 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
14:35 Re[2]: [GSoC: DDG export][RFC] Current status Dmitry Melnik
14:32 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Diego Novillo
13:57 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
12:44 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Richard Guenther
12:23 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
11:51 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Richard Guenther
11:11 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
10:55 Re: About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Richard Guenther
10:18 Re: no_new_pseudos Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:24 About the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate Eric Botcazou
09:03 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Sandiford
09:00 Re: Decimal float and the Cygwin build of GFortran. Paolo Bonzini
08:45 Re: Decimal float and the Cygwin build of GFortran. Angelo Graziosi
08:32 Re: Decimal float and the Cygwin build of GFortran. Brian Dessent
07:39 RE: Decimal float and the Cygwin build of GFortran. Danny Smith
07:19 Decimal float and the Cygwin build of GFortran. Angelo Graziosi
04:18 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
03:47 GCC 4.2.1 Status Report (2007-07-03) Mark Mitchell
03:36 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Geoffrey Keating
02:37 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell
02:26 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
01:31 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Geoffrey Keating
00:13 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Mark Mitchell

July 03, 2007
22:56 Re: Writing to Subversion via Git Bernardo Innocenti
21:43 RE: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
21:36 RE: no_new_pseudos Dave Korn
21:15 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
20:37 Re: Question regarding getting .rodata into the .data section instead of .text Paul Brook
20:08 Re: MPFR 2.3.0 Release Candidate Kaveh R. GHAZI
19:06 How should gcc handle "-shared -pie" and "-pie -shared"? H.J. Lu
18:59 Re: Wow! Richard Guenther
18:47 Re: Question regarding getting .rodata into the .data section instead of .text Andreas Schwab
18:35 Question regarding getting .rodata into the .data section instead of .text Richmond Tuttle
18:00 Re: autoconf 2.61 on debian etch and GCC Ralf Wildenhues
17:10 Re: Wow! Jeffrey Law
16:59 Re: autoconf 2.61 on debian etch and GCC Andreas Schwab
16:48 Re: autoconf 2.61 on debian etch and GCC Ralf Wildenhues
16:29 Re: [patch] conditionally declare bswap functions depending on target Ian Lance Taylor
15:35 [patch] conditionally declare bswap functions depending on target Eric Christopher
14:31 Re: Wow! J.C. Pizarro
14:23 Re: [GSoC: DDG export][RFC] Current status Ian Lance Taylor
12:21 bootstrap broken on powerpc? Dorit Nuzman
11:08 Re: Wow! Richard Guenther
11:03 Re: autoconf 2.61 on debian etch and GCC Martin Michlmayr
10:45 autoconf 2.61 on debian etch and GCC Laurent GUERBY
08:34 Re: 4.3 x86_64 Bootstrap breaks Eric Botcazou
08:28 4.3 x86_64 Bootstrap breaks Ye, Joey
02:11 Re: Wow! Daniel Berlin
01:19 MPFR 2.3.0 Release Candidate Vincent Lefevre

July 02, 2007
22:50 FYI: today's regressions in libstdc++ Paolo Carlini
22:40 gcc-4.1-20070702 is now available gccadmin
21:58 Re: Fwd: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays in Ada -- bug or inherent limitation Robert Dewar
20:43 Re: no_new_pseudos Alexandre Oliva
20:38 Fwd: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays in Ada -- bug or inherent limitation Alinabi
20:32 Re: Wow! Uros Bizjak
18:47 [GSoC: DDG export][RFC] Current status Alexander Monakov
18:37 Re: Wow! Daniel Berlin
18:29 Wow! Uros Bizjak
17:27 Re: no_new_pseudos Jan Hubicka
16:46 Re: no_new_pseudos Ian Lance Taylor
16:34 Re: get complete type Mike Stump
16:27 Re: no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
16:26 Re: no_new_pseudos Paolo Bonzini
16:19 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
16:16 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Earnshaw
16:15 Re: no_new_pseudos Richard Kenner
16:10 no_new_pseudos Kenneth Zadeck
16:00 Is it still true that message-lenght == 72 for C++? Paolo Carlini
12:51 Re: Turning a scope block into not-quite-a nested function? KJKHyperion
11:54 Re: Turning a scope block into not-quite-a nested function? Paolo Bonzini
11:42 Turning a scope block into not-quite-a nested function? KJKHyperion
10:36 Re: Lots of soft-fp warnings Joseph S. Myers
09:58 get complete type allozano
09:48 Lots of soft-fp warnings Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
06:50 Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility Geoffrey Keating
01:55 Re: read source input file Daniel Jacobowitz
01:50 Re: read source input file Ian Lance Taylor
00:16 Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - CC modes / condexec / CC_REGNUM gcc
00:11 read source input file dodegy

July 01, 2007
02:36 Fortran regressions Daniel Berlin

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3