This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Type-punning

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Herman Geza" <hg211 at hszk dot bme dot hu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:59:57 -0700
Subject: Re: Type-punning
References: <Pine.GSO.4.62.0706200019200.18202@ural2> <f5g20i$9rg$1@sea.gmane.org> <467C0AEF.9030208@google.com> <Pine.GSO.4.62.0706262142590.17177@ural2>

On 6/26/07, Herman Geza <hg211@hszk.bme.hu> wrote:

Maybe GCC shouldn't optimize around invalid type-punnings?


That is what -fno-strict-aliasing is for.
Also GCC has done this since 3.0.0 (and also 2.95 and 2.95.1 and then
in 2.95.2 it was changed back while most of the free source world
fixes their code).

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Type-punning
  - From: Herman Geza

References:
- Type-punning
  - From: Herman Geza
- Re: Type-punning
  - From: Sergei Organov
- Re: Type-punning
  - From: Silvius Rus
- Re: Type-punning
  - From: Herman Geza

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]