gcc archive
date index for June, 2007

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

June 30, 2007

21:43	Re: PATCH: Regenerate aclocal.m4 and Makefile.in	Andreas Schwab
20:41	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Ayal Zaks
17:50	Re: PATCH: Regenerate aclocal.m4 and Makefile.in	H.J. Lu
17:36	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Zdenek Dvorak
17:34	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Zdenek Dvorak
09:56	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Ayal Zaks
08:30	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-29)	Andreas Meier
07:52	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Zdenek Dvorak
07:17	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Ayal Zaks
06:55	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Zdenek Dvorak

June 29, 2007

23:47	Re: failed to compile trunk svn rev 126124	Jan Hubicka
22:44	gcc-4.3-20070629 is now available	gccadmin
22:41	Re: Question about validity of wfmath template code	Daniel Schepler
22:21	Re: failed to compile trunk svn rev 126124	Janus Weil
21:46	Re: Fwd: INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX in ia64.h	Jim Wilson
21:44	failed to compile trunk svn rev 126124	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
21:27	Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline	Andrew Pinski
20:50	GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-29)	Mark Mitchell
20:37	Re: Status of trunk freeze	Mark Mitchell
19:19	Re: Type-punning	Herman Geza
19:12	Question about validity of wfmath template code	Daniel Schepler
17:09	Some numbers on Regressions	Andreas Meier
16:14	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Zdenek Dvorak
14:01	Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline	Roman Zippel
12:36	Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems	Eric Botcazou
11:31	Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - CC modes / condexec / CC_REGNUM	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
10:52	Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:46	Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems	Eric Botcazou
06:23	Status of trunk freeze	Steve Kargl
03:05	Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline	Andrew_Pinski
02:58	Re: LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG	Kenneth Zadeck
02:54	Re: PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline	Roman Zippel
02:24	Re: LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG	Mark Mitchell
01:43	Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - CC modes / condexec / CC_REGNUM	Hasjim Williams
00:43	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a

June 28, 2007

21:02	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	mark
20:21	Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:52	Re: Static const int as array bound inside class	Andrew Pinski
13:44	Re: Proposal: adding two zeros to the integer cost to calibrate better.	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:14	Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - condexec / bugfixing / "co-processor offset out of range"	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:55	Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
10:00	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
07:25	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	mark
06:36	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
06:29	Static const int as array bound inside class	Torquil Macdonald Sørensen
05:42	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	mark
05:14	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
03:55	Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - condexec / bugfixing / "co-processor offset out of range"	Hasjim Williams

June 27, 2007

22:47	gcc-4.2-20070627 is now available	gccadmin
19:41	Proposal: adding two zeros to the integer cost to calibrate better.	J.C. Pizarro
17:51	Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems	Eric Botcazou
17:47	Re: combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems	Uros Bizjak
17:33	combine corrupts insns + dumps with insn cost problems	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:30	Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures	Ian Lance Taylor
16:18	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Antoine Chavasse
15:18	Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures	Aldy Hernandez
15:09	Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures	Diego Novillo
11:57	Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures	Kenneth Zadeck
10:43	Re: How to use GCC testsuite..?	Tehila Meyzels
10:31	Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
10:27	Re: How to use GCC testsuite..?	Saurabh Verma
09:20	Re: m68k compound instructions	Andreas Schwab
08:45	Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern	Hasjim Williams
08:42	Re: Type-punning	Andreas Schwab
08:15	Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern	Hasjim Williams
06:18	Re: [ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern	Paolo Bonzini
04:22	Re: Help on testsuite failures, only with optimization & bootstrap	Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
02:35	Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures	Ian Lance Taylor
01:26	[ARM] Cirrus EP93xx Maverick Crunch Support - "bge" pattern	Hasjim Williams
01:13	Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures	Kenneth Zadeck
00:38	Re: Type-punning	Herman Geza
00:24	Re: Type-punning	Andrew Pinski
00:18	Re: Type-punning	Herman Geza

June 26, 2007

23:37	Re: Type-punning	mark
23:31	Re: Type-punning	Herman Geza
23:18	Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures	Ian Lance Taylor
22:44	Re: Type-punning	Andrew Pinski
22:41	Help on testsuite failures, only with optimization & bootstrap	Steve Ellcey
22:36	Re: Type-punning	Silvius Rus
21:42	Re: Type-punning	Herman Geza
21:21	Re: How to use GCC testsuite..?	Tehila Meyzels
21:17	Re: Type-punning	Silvius Rus
21:00	Re: LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG	Kenneth Zadeck
20:48	Re: Type-punning	Andrew Pinski
20:31	Re: Type-punning	Herman Geza
20:20	Re: Extending RTL expansion and CG with a new operation	Pranav Bhandarkar
20:08	[tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures	Diego Novillo
20:00	Re: Type-punning	Andrew Pinski
19:55	Re: Type-punning	Herman Geza
17:45	Re: LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG	Kenneth Zadeck
16:24	LTO reader support for MEMORY_PARTITION_TAG	Mark Mitchell
15:35	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Mark Shinwell
15:08	Workshop on GCC for Research in Embedded and Parallel Systems	Ayal Zaks
14:00	predominantly	Samuel W . Mathews
06:35	Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment	François-Xavier Coudert
06:25	How to use GCC testsuite..?	Venkatesan Jeevanandam
06:17	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Paolo Bonzini

June 25, 2007

22:41	gcc-4.1-20070625 is now available	gccadmin
22:38	Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment	Mike Stump via RT
22:38	Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment	Mike Stump via RT
22:38	Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment	Mike Stump
22:28	Re: [gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment	Hui-May Chang via RT
22:11	[gnu.org #220291] Copyright assignment	Jonas Jacobson via RT
18:29	Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants	H. J. Lu
18:11	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Mike Stump
18:06	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	David Edelsohn
17:55	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Eric Botcazou
17:52	Re: GCC vs. Open64	Jiahua He
17:32	Re: GCC vs. Open64	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
17:07	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Jakub Jelinek
16:58	GCC vs. Open64	Jiahua He
16:48	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Mark Mitchell
16:43	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	David Edelsohn
16:36	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Mark Mitchell
16:29	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Jakub Jelinek
16:20	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Geert Bosch
15:46	m68k compound instructions	Maxim Kuvyrkov
14:16	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Mark Mitchell
14:02	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Alan Modra
13:43	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Daniel Jacobowitz
13:40	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	David Edelsohn
13:31	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Mark Mitchell
13:29	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Jakub Jelinek
13:15	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	David Edelsohn
13:08	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	David Edelsohn
13:07	Re: relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version??	Tim Prince
12:57	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Mark Mitchell
12:32	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Jakub Jelinek
12:22	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Mircea Namolaru
11:48	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Andrew Pinski
11:32	Re: ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	David Edelsohn
11:28	ppc64 __attribute__((visibility ("hidden"))) and multiple TOCs	Jakub Jelinek
09:19	Re: relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version??	ganesh subramonian
05:01	Re: relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version??	Tim Prince
04:52	Re: relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version??	Mike Stump
04:32	relation between gcc/glibc version and linux kernel version??	ganesh subramonian

June 24, 2007

20:17	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Eric Botcazou
16:14	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Mike Stump
14:03	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Revital1 Eres
01:04	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Brooks Moses
00:26	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Ian Lance Taylor
00:23	RE: old intentional gcc bug?	Dave Korn

June 23, 2007

22:13	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Eric Botcazou
21:53	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Brooks Moses
21:39	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Robert Dewar
21:20	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Erik Trulsson
20:36	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Robert Dewar
20:18	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Mark Mitchell
19:51	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Revital1 Eres
18:47	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Eric Botcazou
16:19	Re: old intentional gcc bug?	Erik Trulsson
15:35	old intentional gcc bug?	krith htirk
10:53	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Eric Botcazou

June 22, 2007

22:44	gcc-4.3-20070622 is now available	gccadmin
20:09	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
18:55	Re: [M16C] : 20 bit data access	DJ Delorie
18:48	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Roman Zippel
18:37	Re: Type-punning	Sergei Organov
18:14	Dataflow issues in the MIPS backend.	David Daney
17:46	Re: Type-punning	Silvius Rus
16:53	Re: Type-punning	Chris Lattner
15:18	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
13:41	Extending RTL expansion and CG with a new operation	Thomas Bernard
13:32	Re: Gcc trees	Eddy Pronk
10:31	Re: [M16C] : 20 bit data access	Naveen H.S.
09:30	Re: Type-punning	Sergei Organov
06:06	RE: [M16C] : 20 bit data access	Naveen H.S.
01:56	Re: Type-punning	Silvius Rus

June 21, 2007

23:32	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
23:11	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
22:22	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Michael Meissner
22:08	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
19:31	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Michael Meissner
18:12	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Revital1 Eres
18:06	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Eric Botcazou
18:04	Re: $Revision$ in version string?	Michael Eager
17:38	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Eric Botcazou
17:02	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Revital1 Eres
16:16	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Revital1 Eres
16:15	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Arnaud Charlet
16:09	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
16:07	Re: Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Eric Botcazou
15:54	Re: $Revision$ in version string?	Tobias Burnus
15:45	Re: $Revision$ in version string?	H. J. Lu
15:24	$Revision$ in version string?	Uros Bizjak
14:46	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	H. J. Lu
14:32	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Paolo Bonzini
13:42	Bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64 for Ada	Revital1 Eres
13:25	Re: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-5.c on gcc-4.2 branch	Uros Bizjak
13:16	Re: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-5.c on gcc-4.2 branch	H. J. Lu
13:10	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Andreas Schwab
13:06	Re: Gcc trees	Revital1 Eres
13:01	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
12:52	Gcc trees	allozano
10:54	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Roman Zippel
09:33	high definition tv for your pc	Ronald Lester
09:25	To TV Fans reg: MyTVPAL = HIGH DEFINITION TV FOR YOUR PC!!!	Ronald Lester
09:22	To TV Fans reg: MyTVPAL = FREE HIGH DEFINITION TV FOR YOUR PC!!!	Ronald Lester
09:17	Re: libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2]	Pompapathi V Gadad
09:16	To TV Fans From Ron reg: MyTVPAL = FREE HIGH DEFINITION TV FOR YOUR PC!!!	Ronald Lester
08:50	Re: libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2]	Eric Christopher
08:15	FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-5.c on gcc-4.2 branch	Uros Bizjak
06:49	Re: libjava is broken	Keith Seitz
05:25	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
04:49	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
04:42	Re: libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2]	Pompapathi V Gadad
04:34	Re: libjava is broken	David Daney
02:42	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	CaT
02:40	libjava is broken	H. J. Lu
02:31	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
02:25	Re: [tuples] Accessors for RHS of assignments	Diego Novillo

June 20, 2007

23:52	Re: libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2]	Eric Christopher
23:13	Re: [tuples] Accessors for RHS of assignments	Zdenek Dvorak
22:40	gcc-4.2-20070620 is now available	gccadmin
21:42	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Michael Meissner
20:48	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
19:41	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Roman Zippel
18:41	Re: [tuples] Accessors for RHS of assignments	Andrew MacLeod
18:31	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell
18:19	[tuples] Accessors for RHS of assignments	Diego Novillo
18:08	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
18:04	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Bernd Schmidt
17:58	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Chris Lattner
17:47	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mark Mitchell
17:13	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Paolo Bonzini
17:08	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
17:06	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
17:05	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Paolo Bonzini
16:48	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Roman Zippel
16:12	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
15:52	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Michael Meissner
15:51	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
15:34	Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Mike Stump
15:06	Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system	Michael Matz
15:01	Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system	Eric Botcazou
14:42	RE: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system	Dave Korn
14:36	Re: Type system functions to their own file?	Richard Guenther
14:34	Type system functions to their own file?	Giovanni Bajo
14:33	Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Joseph S. Myers
14:32	Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system	Michael Matz
14:25	Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system	Andrew Pinski
14:22	Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system	Richard Guenther
14:17	Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Ian Lance Taylor
14:17	Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system	Michael Matz
13:40	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Roman Zippel
13:33	Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Daniel Jacobowitz
13:27	Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Diego Novillo
13:09	RE: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Bokhanko, Andrey S
13:04	Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7	Richard Guenther
13:03	Re: preventing -m options being passed to the compiler	Andrew Pinski
13:01	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
12:59	Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Diego Novillo
12:59	Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7	Dominique Dhumieres
12:50	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Roman Zippel
12:37	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
12:19	Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7	Richard Guenther
12:09	[PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1 to work towards a middle-end type system	Richard Guenther
12:09	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Roman Zippel
11:57	RE: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Bokhanko, Andrey S
11:52	RE: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Bokhanko, Andrey S
11:41	Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7	Dominique Dhumieres
11:33	Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Diego Novillo
11:25	Re: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Sergei Organov
10:52	RE: How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Dave Korn
10:35	How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing rules?	Bokhanko, Andrey S
05:52	libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not supported [bswapdi2]	Pompapathi V Gadad
05:14	Re: virtual stack regs.	Paolo Bonzini
03:47	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mark Mitchell
01:59	Re: preventing -m options being passed to the compiler	Ben Elliston
01:40	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Ross Ridge
00:55	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Lawrence Crowl
00:44	preventing -m options being passed to the compiler	Ben Elliston
00:11	Re: class 3 edges	Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)

June 19, 2007

22:58	Re: Type-punning	Silvius Rus
22:37	Type-punning	Herman Geza
21:51	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Michael Meissner
21:01	class 3 edges	Sunzir Deepur
20:51	Re: [M16C] : 20 bit data access	DJ Delorie
20:35	scalar expansion and array privatization for loop distribution	Jagasia, Harsha
19:52	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Toon Moene
18:41	Re: Object attribute tagging	Eric Christopher
17:43	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
17:20	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
16:05	Re: virtual stack regs.	Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
15:43	Re: Where can I find "sizeof" implementation in front end	Paolo Bonzini
15:39	RE: Where can I find "sizeof" implementation in front end	Dave Korn
15:25	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell
15:20	Where can I find "sizeof" implementation in front end	bjzheng
15:04	Re: cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o testcase	Jakub Jelinek
14:49	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Richard Earnshaw
14:07	Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7	Dominique Dhumieres
14:05	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Roman Zippel
14:02	Re: Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7	Richard Guenther
13:48	Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 20070615 on powerpc-apple-darwin7	Dominique Dhumieres
13:41	Re: m68k bootstrap problem	Kenneth Zadeck
13:35	m68k bootstrap problem	Roman Zippel
13:28	cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o testcase	Revital1 Eres
13:19	Re: virtual stack regs.	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:48	Re: New LTO branch ready	Daniel Berlin
12:33	Re: virtual stack regs.	Kenneth Zadeck
11:55	run-time function adaptation for statically-compiled programs	Grigori Fursin
11:23	RE: Object attribute tagging	Dave Korn
10:10	Re: virtual stack regs.	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:11	Re: virtual stack regs.	Uros Bizjak
09:05	Re: virtual stack regs.	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:04	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Richard Guenther
08:51	Re: virtual stack regs.	Jan Hubicka
08:44	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Paolo Bonzini
08:03	Re: Object attribute tagging	Richard Earnshaw
07:33	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Richard Guenther
06:00	Re: New LTO branch ready	Mark Mitchell
05:57	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell
05:39	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Uros Bizjak
04:47	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Chris Lattner
03:12	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Mark Mitchell
02:41	Re: Object attribute tagging	H. J. Lu
02:31	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
01:50	Object attribute tagging	Joseph S. Myers
01:17	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Daniel Jacobowitz
00:28	virtual stack regs.	Kenneth Zadeck
00:05	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	tbp

June 18, 2007

23:57	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
23:12	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Brian Dessent
23:07	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
23:07	RE: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Dave Korn
23:04	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Mark Mitchell
22:52	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Eric Christopher
22:46	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
22:41	gcc-4.1-20070618 is now available	gccadmin
22:32	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Eric Christopher
22:22	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
22:11	RE: Fixed-point branch?	Fu, Chao-Ying
21:46	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Eric Christopher
21:45	Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants	H. J. Lu
21:36	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
21:33	Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants	Steve Ellcey
21:30	Re: Fixed-point branch?	Bernd Schmidt
21:08	Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants	H. J. Lu
21:06	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
21:03	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
21:00	The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.17 is released	H. J. Lu
20:59	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
20:58	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
20:57	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
20:54	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
20:42	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Adam Nemet
20:07	Fwd: INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX in ia64.h	Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
20:06	RE: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Jagasia, Harsha
20:04	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
20:01	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	Mark Mitchell
19:51	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
19:32	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
19:26	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Adam Nemet
19:18	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
19:16	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
19:10	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Bradley Lucier
18:48	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
18:46	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Adam Nemet
18:38	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
18:27	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Bradley Lucier
18:26	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Brooks Moses
18:26	RE: Fixed-point branch?	Fu, Chao-Ying
18:15	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Uros Bizjak
18:10	Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants	Steve Ellcey
17:57	New LTO branch ready	Daniel Berlin
17:48	Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants	H. J. Lu
17:45	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Daniel Berlin
17:33	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Sebastian Pop
17:25	Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants	Uros Bizjak
17:16	Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants	H. J. Lu
17:06	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell
16:25	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Devang Patel
16:23	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
16:08	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Andrew Haley
15:38	Requesting SVN write access (Was: [PATCH frv] Fix PR ...)	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
15:23	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
15:10	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Doug Gregor
14:58	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
14:58	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
14:56	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
14:55	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
14:49	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
14:32	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
14:22	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Joern Rennecke
14:20	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
14:19	Re: missing symbols	Andrew Pinski
14:16	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
14:13	Re: missing symbols	costin_c
13:52	missing symbols	costin_c
13:38	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
13:24	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	KJKHyperion
13:21	gcov / gcov-dump	Eddy Pronk
13:08	Re: More vectorizer testcases?	Dorit Nuzman
12:53	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
12:32	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Eric Botcazou
12:26	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Dorit Nuzman
12:07	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	tbp
12:06	Re: More vectorizer testcases?	Giovanni Bajo
12:01	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	tbp
11:55	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Richard Guenther
11:52	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Daniel Berlin
11:50	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Giovanni Bajo
11:46	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Uros Bizjak
11:37	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
11:24	Re: More vectorizer testcases?	Dorit Nuzman
11:20	Re: Fixed-point branch?	Bernd Schmidt
11:01	[M16C] : 20 bit data access	Naveen H.S.
10:59	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Richard Guenther
10:52	Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work)	Dorit Nuzman
10:47	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Dorit Nuzman
10:16	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	tbp
10:11	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Dorit Nuzman
09:27	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Richard Guenther
09:06	Re: Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat	Michael Matz
08:54	Re: PR other/32351 [Was: Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)]	Paolo Bonzini
08:35	Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator	Richard Guenther
06:46	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	Ben Elliston
06:35	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Eric Botcazou
06:30	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Eric Botcazou
05:29	Re: machine learning for loop unrolling	Ken Raeburn
04:37	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
02:44	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Chris Lattner
02:43	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
01:58	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
01:47	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Tim Prince
01:41	RE: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Dave Korn
01:26	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Ismail Dönmez
01:23	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
00:15	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner

June 17, 2007

21:14	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Laurent GUERBY
21:06	Re: Suffix for __float128 FP constants	Joseph S. Myers
21:02	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
20:57	Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work)	Tim Prince
20:52	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Laurent GUERBY
20:28	Suffix for __float128 FP constants	Uros Bizjak
20:22	Re: Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge	Kenneth Zadeck
19:31	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
19:09	Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work)	Janne Blomqvist
19:06	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Giovanni Bajo
18:24	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Adam Nemet
18:22	Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator	Revital1 Eres
18:20	Re: Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Uros Bizjak
17:47	Activate -mrecip with -ffast-math?	Giovanni Bajo
17:43	More vectorizer testcases?	Giovanni Bajo
17:41	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
17:34	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Aaron W. LaFramboise
17:31	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
17:16	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Ross Ridge
17:16	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
16:48	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:47	Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work)	Tim Prince
16:11	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	H. J. Lu
15:18	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Daniel Berlin
15:09	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Robert Dewar
15:07	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Robert Dewar
14:52	Re: init-regs pass initializes virtual-stack-vars?	Uros Bizjak
14:51	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Ryan Hill
14:33	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Ross Ridge
13:59	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Paolo Bonzini
12:11	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Ira Rosen
11:47	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
10:44	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Martin Jambor
08:30	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Dorit Nuzman
08:30	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Dorit Nuzman
08:04	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Eric Botcazou
07:36	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Eric Botcazou
06:39	Re: Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
05:13	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Chris Lattner
03:36	Re: Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge	Kenneth Zadeck
03:34	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
03:31	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
03:26	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Robert Dewar
01:47	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Richard Kenner
01:32	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
01:16	RE: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
01:16	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Tim Prince
00:48	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Joe Buck
00:06	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	H. J. Lu

June 16, 2007

23:59	Re: PR other/32351 [Was: Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)]	H. J. Lu
23:41	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Ryan Hill
23:31	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	Mark Mitchell
23:13	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	Mark Mitchell
23:06	RE: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Danny Smith
22:49	Re: init-regs pass initializes virtual-stack-vars?	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
22:20	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Eric Botcazou
21:32	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
20:25	Re: Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge	Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
20:23	RE: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Dave Korn
19:29	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
19:23	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
19:21	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	David Fang
19:14	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Andrew Pinski
19:08	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
18:54	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Joe Buck
18:54	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
18:53	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell
18:42	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Joe Buck
18:11	init-regs pass initializes virtual-stack-vars?	Uros Bizjak
17:39	Re: Status of simulator targets after dataflow merge	Mike Stein
17:34	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Ross Ridge
16:52	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
16:51	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Robert Dewar
16:46	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
16:13	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Daniel Berlin
15:53	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Dorit Nuzman
15:51	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Dorit Nuzman
15:39	Re: Access to raw repositories	Andreas Schwab
15:31	Status of simulator targets after dataflow merge	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
15:29	PR other/32351 [Was: Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)]	Uros Bizjak
15:26	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Dorit Nuzman
15:20	Re: Access to raw repositories	Bernardo Innocenti
15:04	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Joel Sherrill
13:25	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	H. J. Lu
13:18	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	H. J. Lu
13:17	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	H. J. Lu
11:01	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Robert Dewar
09:30	Fixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
07:30	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Eric Botcazou
07:23	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Chris Lattner
06:59	Re: When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM.	Chris Lattner
06:45	Re: r125698 breaks bootstrap on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu	Andrew Pinski
05:47	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	Andrew Pinski
05:09	PTR-PLUS merge into the mainline	Andrew_Pinski
04:54	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	David Fang
04:51	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Brooks Moses
04:10	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
03:46	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	Andrew Pinski
03:45	Re: GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	Kaveh R. GHAZI
03:36	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Richard Kenner
03:33	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Richard Kenner
03:32	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
03:28	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Richard Kenner
03:25	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
03:12	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Andrew Pinski
03:08	When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM.	J.C. Pizarro
03:04	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
03:00	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
02:43	Re: When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM.	Ian Lance Taylor
02:42	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Ian Lance Taylor
02:19	When EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM.	J.C. Pizarro
02:17	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Andrew Pinski
02:03	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Daniel Jacobowitz
02:02	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	J.C. Pizarro
01:54	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	H. J. Lu
01:43	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Ian Lance Taylor
01:22	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Ian Lance Taylor
00:51	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell
00:37	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Tobias Burnus
00:36	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Andrew Pinski
00:26	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell

June 15, 2007

23:51	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Andrew Pinski
23:50	Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	Joe Buck
23:48	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Bill Wendling
23:47	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell
23:25	I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)	michael.a
23:23	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
23:04	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Chris Lattner
22:55	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Richard Kenner
22:45	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell
22:44	gcc-4.3-20070615 is now available	gccadmin
22:40	GCC Status Report (2007-06-15)	Mark Mitchell
22:29	Re: RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Bill Wendling
22:16	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Adam Nemet
21:43	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
21:36	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Eric Botcazou
21:28	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
21:13	Re: Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Daniel Berlin
21:08	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Daniel Berlin
20:55	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Eric Botcazou
20:21	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
19:41	Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers"	Diego Novillo
19:38	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Ian Lance Taylor
19:31	Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers"	Tobias Schlüter
19:28	Re: machine learning for loop unrolling	Zdenek Dvorak
19:14	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
19:10	Re: Access to raw repositories	Andreas Schwab
18:58	Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers"	Brooks Moses
18:56	Access to raw repositories	Bernardo Innocenti
18:43	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Ian Lance Taylor
18:36	Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers"	Kenneth Zadeck
17:56	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Joe Buck
17:50	Re: [fixed-point] Fixed-point branch merge plan	Mark Mitchell
17:48	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
17:07	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Joe Buck
16:52	Re: machine learning for loop unrolling	Stefan Ciobaca
16:33	Incorrect bitfield aliasing with Tree SSA	Adam Nemet
16:14	RE: Some thoughts about steering committee work	Kenneth Zadeck
16:07	RE: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS	Deepen Mantri
15:32	Re: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS	Andrew STUBBS
15:28	Re: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS	Frank Ch. Eigler
15:20	RE: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS	Deepen Mantri
14:35	Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS	Deepen Mantri
14:32	Re: Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat	Vladimir N. Makarov
14:32	Re: Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat	Diego Novillo
14:05	Re: Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat	Richard Guenther
13:58	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
13:20	Resuming SPEC performance tracking at RedHat	Vladimir N. Makarov
13:05	Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Richard Kenner
12:49	Some thoughts about steerring commitee work	Vladimir N. Makarov
11:01	Re: Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS	Andrew STUBBS
10:37	Libmudflap for sh-elf toolchain cannot access environment variable MUDFLAP_OPTIONS	Deepen Mantri
08:12	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Maxim Kuvyrkov
07:48	RFC: Make dllimport/dllexport imply default visibility	Mark Mitchell
06:49	Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers"	FX Coudert
06:14	Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers"	Steve Kargl
05:31	Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers"	Brooks Moses
04:41	Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers"	Steve Kargl
03:50	Re: [patch,committed] Make Fortran maintainers "Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers"	Brooks Moses

June 14, 2007

19:29	Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc	DJ Delorie
19:04	Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc	Uros Bizjak
18:28	Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc	Jakub Jelinek
18:17	Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc	Daniel Jacobowitz
18:14	Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc	Uros Bizjak
17:34	Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc	Jakub Jelinek
17:27	Re: How to submit Intel BID library patch?	H. J. Lu
17:27	Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc	Richard Guenther
17:14	Re: How to submit Intel BID library patch?	Janis Johnson
17:02	RFA: (dataflow?) testsuite regression since last week	Bob Wilson
16:36	Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc	Joe Buck
16:32	Re: Please fork soft-fp from libc	Joseph S. Myers
16:11	Re: Merge PTR_PLUS branch?	Mark Mitchell
16:11	Please fork soft-fp from libc	Uros Bizjak
14:37	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
13:57	Re: Ian Taylor appoined non-algorithmic GWP	Ian Lance Taylor
13:31	How to submit Intel BID library patch?	H. J. Lu
13:08	Re: maybe configure.ac problem ?	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
13:08	Re: Diego Novillo appointed middle-end maintainer and non-algorithmic GWP	Diego Novillo
13:04	maybe configure.ac problem ?	Basile STARYNKEVITCH
11:53	[PATCH] Fix breakage	Paolo Bonzini
11:04	r125698 breaks bootstrap on trunk for i686-pc-linux-gnu	Thomas Veith
10:37	Diego Novillo appointed middle-end maintainer and non-algorithmic GWP	David Edelsohn
10:36	Ian Taylor appoined non-algorithmic GWP	David Edelsohn
10:06	Bootstrap failure on trunk	Thomas Veith
08:09	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Richard Guenther
05:09	Re: Splitting function arguments.	Mohamed Shafi
04:44	Re: Merge PTR_PLUS branch?	Diego Novillo
04:36	Re: Procedure to submit new port (CR16 processor)	Pompapathi V Gadad
03:33	Re: Merge PTR_PLUS branch?	Andrew Pinski
00:01	Merge PTR_PLUS branch?	Mark Mitchell

June 13, 2007

22:42	gcc-4.2-20070613 is now available	gccadmin
21:39	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Richard Guenther
21:05	Re: Backtrace() called inside a signal handler traps while tracking an invalid function call.	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:56	Backtrace() called inside a signal handler traps while tracking an invalid function call.	supriya kannery
19:22	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Kenneth Zadeck
18:52	Re: Generating a phi node	Sebastian Pop
18:43	Generating a phi node	Revital1 Eres
17:56	Re: Blackfin eh broken with dataflow merge	Kenneth Zadeck
17:48	Re: Splitting function arguments.	Ian Lance Taylor
17:47	Re: Procedure to submit new port (CR16 processor)	Ian Lance Taylor
17:44	Blackfin eh broken with dataflow merge	Bernd Schmidt
15:47	Re: Sparc bootstrap failure, dataflow related?	Kaveh R. GHAZI
14:11	Re: sparc-rtems4.7-gcc versus fpu	Joel Sherrill
14:08	Re: sparc-rtems4.7-gcc versus fpu	Eric Botcazou
13:35	Re: LOG_LINKS information after dataflow merge	Paolo Bonzini
13:32	LOG_LINKS information after dataflow merge	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:10	Re: sparc-rtems4.7-gcc versus fpu	Joel Sherrill
11:18	sparc-rtems4.7-gcc versus fpu	Peter A. Krauss
09:50	Splitting function arguments.	Mohamed Shafi
08:08	Procedure to submit new port (CR16 processor)	Pompapathi V Gadad
07:40	lock-less containers?	dm . n9107
00:09	Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator	Daniel Berlin

June 12, 2007

22:47	Access to .dynamic section of executable from shared library	Konstantin Baydarov
22:25	MIPS bootstrap failure, dataflow related?	David Daney
21:24	Re: Sparc bootstrap failure, dataflow related?	Kenneth Zadeck
21:17	Sparc bootstrap failure, dataflow related?	Kaveh R. GHAZI
20:45	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Kenneth Zadeck
20:41	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
19:45	Re: Dataflow bug [RE: Large number of fortran testsuite failures]	Paolo Bonzini
19:10	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Richard Guenther
15:15	RE: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Dave Korn
14:59	Re: Creating new variable in tree level	Richard Guenther
14:54	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Kenneth Zadeck
14:53	Creating new variable in tree level	Revital1 Eres
14:46	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Richard Guenther
14:43	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Kenneth Zadeck
14:35	RE: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Dave Korn
14:09	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Richard Guenther
14:05	Re: Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Kenneth Zadeck
13:35	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Zdenek Dvorak
13:06	promoting function arguments - GCC 4.1.1	Rohit Arul Raj
12:39	Dataflow bug [RE: Large number of fortran testsuite failures]	Dave Korn
12:37	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Vladimir Yanovsky
12:37	Re: Large number of fortran testsuite failures	FX Coudert
12:13	Re: Large number of fortran testsuite failures	Paul Richard Thomas
12:10	Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator	Revital1 Eres
11:48	Some regressions from the dataflow merge	Richard Guenther
11:28	Re: Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Zdenek Dvorak
10:35	Does unrolling prevents doloop optimizations?	Vladimir Yanovsky
08:00	Large number of fortran testsuite failures	Paul Richard Thomas
02:31	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mark Mitchell

June 11, 2007

22:42	gcc-4.1-20070611 is now available	gccadmin
22:37	[fixed-point] Fixed-point branch merge plan	Fu, Chao-Ying
22:29	Re: STL in G++?	Joe Buck
22:06	STL in G++?	Dean Anderson
21:50	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	H. J. Lu
21:33	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Michael Meissner
20:19	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Kaveh R. GHAZI
17:58	Re: Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch	Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:45	Re: [RFC] Aggregate mapping	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:33	Re: Help understanding tree-affine.c	Zdenek Dvorak
15:43	Help understanding tree-affine.c	Revital1 Eres
15:26	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Bernd Schmidt
13:19	Another reload inheritance bug	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
11:47	Dataflow maintainers	David Edelsohn
11:25	Re: Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch	Kenneth Zadeck
11:03	Re: mf-runtime.c IC error..	Seema S. Ravandale
09:50	Re: FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10	Krupa Stephen Gadde
09:31	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:04	mf-runtime.c IC error..	Seema S. Ravandale
08:56	Re: FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10	Richard Guenther
08:22	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Mark Shinwell
05:47	Re: Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch	Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
04:36	Re: Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch	Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
04:30	FW: [gnu.org #336636] Needed Java Compilers for SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10	Krupa Stephen Gadde
02:51	Miscompilations for cris-elf on dataflow-branch	Hans-Peter Nilsson

June 10, 2007

23:24	LTO Status Report (2007-06-10)	Mark Mitchell
22:54	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mark Mitchell
21:54	Re: machine learning for loop unrolling	Grigori Fursin
16:56	[RFC] Aggregate mapping	Jim Tison
07:05	Re: Generating DWARF CIE info	Eric Botcazou

June 09, 2007

23:29	Fwd: gcc 3.1.2 build on Solaris 2.9 - success	Ray Holme
22:35	Re: Generating DWARF CIE info	Michael Eager
21:57	Re: Generating DWARF CIE info	Eric Botcazou
20:00	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mark Mitchell
19:59	general register used as saving comparison result	Ying Yi
18:49	Re: Generating DWARF CIE info	Michael Eager
17:50	Re: Generating DWARF CIE info	Eric Botcazou
14:58	Re: Generating DWARF CIE info	Michael Eager
14:38	Re: Generating DWARF CIE info	Eric Botcazou
13:48	Re: Generating DWARF CIE info	Michael Eager
11:39	gcc 3.1.2 build on Solaris 2.9	Ray Holme
09:25	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Richard Guenther
07:54	Re: Generating DWARF CIE info	Eric Botcazou
07:14	Re: machine learning for loop unrolling	Maxim Kuvyrkov
06:52	Re: [bug] undefined symbols with -Woverloaded-virtual and -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage	Brooks Moses
06:24	Re: [bug] undefined symbols with -Woverloaded-virtual and -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage	Lothar Werzinger
02:23	Re: Fixed-point branch?	Mark Mitchell
02:14	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Andrew Pinski
00:01	Re: machine learning for loop unrolling	Zdenek Dvorak

June 08, 2007

23:52	MIPS results on the pointer_plus branch.	David Daney
22:45	gcc-4.3-20070608 is now available	gccadmin
22:33	[fixed-point] A diff file for all changes	Fu, Chao-Ying
21:56	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Brooks Moses
21:53	RE: Fixed-point branch?	Fu, Chao-Ying
20:36	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mark Mitchell
20:27	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mark Mitchell
20:18	Re: note_stores vs. PRE_DEC, POST_INC and so on	Ian Lance Taylor
20:12	Generating DWARF CIE info	Michael Eager
19:58	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mike Stump
19:50	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mark Mitchell
19:21	note_stores vs. PRE_DEC, POST_INC and so on	Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
19:04	Re: machine learning for loop unrolling	Kenneth Hoste
18:48	Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range	Richard Kenner
18:36	Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range	Tom Tromey
17:38	ada, gcc 4.3 and darwin?	Jack Howarth
16:11	room for GCC Summit	James Lemke
15:15	RE: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Cornea, Marius
14:31	machine learning for loop unrolling	Stefan Ciobaca
14:20	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Janne Blomqvist
13:30	machine learning for loop unrolling	Stefan Ciobaca
13:07	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	H. J. Lu
13:00	Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	H. J. Lu
12:50	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Joseph S. Myers
07:40	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Zdenek Dvorak
07:29	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Brooks Moses
07:20	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mike Stump
07:16	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Harvey Harrison
07:11	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Jan Hubicka
07:06	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Jan Hubicka
06:48	Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Brooks Moses
05:33	GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-06-07)	Mark Mitchell
05:32	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
05:01	Re: Fixed-point branch?	Mark Mitchell
04:52	Writing to Subversion via Git	Ollie Wild
04:34	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Harvey Harrison

June 07, 2007

23:42	RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Danny Smith
21:07	TeX sources for tuples document uploaded to the wiki	Diego Novillo
18:37	Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range	Richard Kenner
16:44	[mingw] arm-elf-gcc build error with fixincludes file error	Brian Sidebotham
16:11	Re: DWARF-2 unwinder versus MIPS n32	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:05	Re: DWARF-2 unwinder versus MIPS n32	David Daney
15:59	RE: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h>	Dave Korn
15:54	Re: DWARF-2 unwinder versus MIPS n32	David Daney
15:51	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Daniel Berlin
15:49	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Richard Guenther
15:49	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Daniel Berlin
15:43	Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range	Richard Guenther
15:29	DWARF-2 unwinder versus MIPS n32	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:04	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Zdenek Dvorak
15:02	Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range	Richard Kenner
14:51	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Ian Lance Taylor
14:43	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Ian Lance Taylor
14:31	Re: hash_rtx and volatile subexpressions	Ian Lance Taylor
14:26	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Ian Lance Taylor
14:21	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Matt Fago
14:03	hash_rtx and volatile subexpressions	Andrey Belevantsev
13:52	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Ian Lance Taylor
13:05	Re: libjava is a train wreck.	Daniel Berlin
13:03	Re: [rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Daniel Berlin
12:52	Re: A problem with the loop structure	Vladimir Yanovsky
11:05	Any interest in i586-pc-interix3 configuration improvements?	Kaz Sasayama
11:04	[rfc] Moving bbs back to pools	Zdenek Dvorak
10:13	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Jakub Jelinek
10:09	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Paolo Bonzini
08:57	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Jakub Jelinek
08:36	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Florian Weimer
03:04	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Aaron Gray
02:47	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Richard Kenner
00:22	Re: [bug] undefined symbols with -Woverloaded-virtual and -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage	Joe Buck

June 06, 2007

23:40	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Aaron Gray
22:44	Re: libjava is a train wreck.	Ben Elliston
22:43	gcc-4.2-20070606 is now available	gccadmin
22:41	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Robert Dewar
22:40	Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	Ben Elliston
22:40	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Robert Dewar
20:23	RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Danny Smith
19:21	dataflow branch merge plans.	Kenneth Zadeck
19:14	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Andrew Haley
19:08	Re: how to build executable instructions blocks dynamically	Mike Stump
18:13	[bug] undefined symbols with -Woverloaded-virtual and -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage	Lothar Werzinger
17:21	RE: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma	Dave Korn
16:50	RE: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma	Dave Korn
16:43	how to build executable instructions blocks dynamically	Gorgonite
16:30	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Olivier Hainque
16:28	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Olivier Hainque
15:27	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Paolo Bonzini
15:02	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Jack Lloyd
14:46	Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	Gerald Pfeifer
14:40	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Simon Brenner
14:30	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Ian Lance Taylor
13:52	RE: segmentation fault	Dave Korn
13:41	RE: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h>	Dave Korn
13:36	Re: libjava is a train wreck.	Diego Novillo
13:34	Re: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h>	Tim Prince
12:26	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Richard Kenner
12:08	RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Rupert Wood
12:06	gcj java help	sharads
12:01	RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Rupert Wood
11:42	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Andrew Haley
11:36	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Simon Brenner
11:26	RE: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Dave Korn
11:13	RE: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma	Dave Korn
11:13	RE: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma	Dave Korn
11:04	Re: use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Simon Brenner
10:51	RE: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h>	Dave Korn
09:41	Re: Creating a patch ready for gcc-patches list	Brian Sidebotham
09:36	Re: Creating a patch ready for gcc-patches list	Jan-Benedict Glaw
09:30	Re: Creating a patch ready for gcc-patches list	Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:15	Creating a patch ready for gcc-patches list	Brian Sidebotham
07:48	use of %n in genmodes.c causes trouble on Vista	Olivier Hainque
00:50	Re: segmentation fault	Ben Elliston

June 05, 2007

23:07	Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator	Daniel Berlin
22:16	RE: Fixed-point branch?	Fu, Chao-Ying
19:51	Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Simon Baldwin
17:44	Re: linking problem with boost	Mike Stump
17:39	Re: libjava is a train wreck.	Mike Stump
17:35	Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Aaron Gray
17:27	linking problem with boost	ronnie_raj
17:19	Re: Fixed-point branch?	Mark Mitchell
17:15	Re: vector compare	Paul Brook
17:13	Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Mark Mitchell
16:55	Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Ian Lance Taylor
16:43	Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Andrew Pinski
16:41	Re: libjava is a train wreck.	Andrew Haley
16:36	Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Aaron Gray
16:33	Re: libjava is a train wreck.	David Daney
15:49	segmentation fault	fred . cotton
15:30	RE: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x?	Deepen Mantri
15:28	Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Andrew Haley
15:23	Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Andrew Pinski
15:18	Re: Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Andrew Haley
15:13	Something weird with cp/decl.c switch statement	Aaron Gray
13:53	Re: Bootstrap failure on ppc64	Ian Lance Taylor
13:34	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Mark Shinwell
13:30	Re: Bootstrap failure on ppc64	Tim Prince
12:57	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Bernd Schmidt
12:56	Re: vector compare	Revital1 Eres
12:39	vector compare	Ying Yi
12:17	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Mark Shinwell
11:41	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Bernd Schmidt
11:38	Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator	Revital1 Eres
11:19	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Mark Shinwell
10:43	Re: A reload inheritance bug	Bernd Schmidt
07:06	Bootstrap failure on ppc64	Revital1 Eres
04:28	libjava is a train wreck.	Steve Kargl
03:57	Re: Comments for empty for-loop parts (was Re: xserver: Branch 'master' - 6 commits)	Bernardo Innocenti
03:16	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
00:57	Re: current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma	Tim Prince
00:32	RE: Fixed-point branch?	Fu, Chao-Ying

June 04, 2007

22:44	Re: testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h>	Ian Lance Taylor
22:40	gcc-4.1-20070604 is now available	gccadmin
20:42	Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	H. J. Lu
20:23	Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	Janis Johnson
19:05	testsuite trigraphs.c failure due to cygwin <stdio.h>	Timothy C Prince
19:03	Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator	Daniel Berlin
17:33	Re: What is purpose of numbered variables??	Diego Novillo
16:15	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Jan-Benedict Glaw
16:02	current gcc trunk testsuite failure on cygwin: Assembler messages: Warning: end of file in string; '"' inserted: Warning: .stabs: missing comma	Christian Joensson
11:24	Re: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x?	Frank Ch. Eigler
11:10	RE: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x?	Deepen Mantri
10:28	Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator	Revital1 Eres
09:17	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
09:13	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	David Woodhouse
08:12	Re: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x?	Eric Christopher
08:03	question about switch table	ligang
07:40	RE: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x?	Deepen Mantri
07:22	Re: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x?	Eric Christopher
07:11	RE: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x?	Deepen Mantri
03:02	Libjava is broken again	H. J. Lu
02:57	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Harvey Harrison
02:29	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti

June 03, 2007

23:14	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Harvey Harrison
22:45	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Gabriel Paubert
19:54	Re: Help in understanding ccp propagator	Daniel Berlin
15:28	Re: How to enable Mudflap in gcc 4.x?	Frank Ch. Eigler
12:48	Help in understanding ccp propagator	Revital1 Eres
12:42	Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	Gerald Pfeifer
11:53	Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	Ben Elliston
04:51	Re: gcc-current: badly worded warning?	Eyal Lebedinsky
01:49	Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	H. J. Lu
01:17	Re: When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	Peter Bergner

June 02, 2007

19:34	Re: Redefinition of symbol ???	Bruce Korb
19:29	Redefinition of symbol ???	Bruce Korb
14:35	When was decimal floating point added to gcc?	H. J. Lu
05:50	Re: __builtin_apply_args - GCC 4.1.1	Ian Lance Taylor
04:47	Re: __builtin_apply_args - GCC 4.1.1	Mohamed Shafi

June 01, 2007

22:42	gcc-4.3-20070601 is now available	gccadmin
21:36	Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006	H. J. Lu
20:31	Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006	Zdenek Dvorak
20:24	Re: Optimizations for itanium	Andrey Belevantsev
19:45	What is purpose of numbered variables??	Seema S. Ravandale
18:55	Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006	Andrew Pinski
17:57	Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006	H. J. Lu
17:00	Re: DOC PATCH: attribute(alloc_size)	Marcus Meissner
16:55	Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006	Andrew Pinski
16:44	Re: Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006	H. J. Lu
16:37	Predictive commoning miscompiles 482.sphinx3 in SPEC CPU 2006	H. J. Lu
16:29	DOC PATCH: attribute(alloc_size)	Marcus Meissner
15:58	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
15:43	Re: Optimizations for itanium	Vladimir N. Makarov
15:29	RE: Optimizations for itanium	Prasad, Kamal R
15:26	Re: signal unwind and fp state	Roman Zippel
15:22	Re: Optimizations for itanium	Vladimir N. Makarov
15:18	[OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Gabriel Paubert
15:00	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
14:40	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
14:30	Re: signal unwind and fp state	Ian Lance Taylor
14:23	Re: __builtin_apply_args - GCC 4.1.1	Ian Lance Taylor
14:15	Re: Optimizations for itanium	Ian Lance Taylor
13:51	signal unwind and fp state	Roman Zippel
12:57	[OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Gabriel Paubert
12:45	synchronous cancel and "terminate called without an active exception"	Pavel Emeliyanenko
11:12	Re: Very Fast: Directly Coded Lexical Analyzer	J.C. Pizarro
10:51	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Jan-Benedict Glaw
10:26	Re: Very Fast: Directly Coded Lexical Analyzer	Ronny Peine
10:13	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Gabriel Paubert
10:08	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	David Woodhouse
09:08	__builtin_apply_args - GCC 4.1.1	Mohamed Shafi
08:57	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Jan-Benedict Glaw
08:51	Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Andreas Schwab
08:47	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
08:40	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Jan-Benedict Glaw
07:28	Re: Very Fast: Directly Coded Lexical Analyzer	Frank Schaefer
07:26	[OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Gabriel Paubert
07:02	Optimizations for itanium	Prasad, Kamal R
06:52	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
05:12	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Harvey Harrison
04:12	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
03:37	Re: Git repository with full GCC history	Harvey Harrison
01:36	Re: Access to symbol table??	Daniel Berlin
01:35	Git repository with full GCC history	Bernardo Innocenti
00:43	Re: Very Fast: Directly Coded Lexical Analyzer	J.C. Pizarro

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)