This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bribing a reviewer
- From: Thomas Neumann <tneumann at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask at sygehus dot dk>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 19:04:01 +0200
- Subject: Re: Bribing a reviewer
- References: <f37d8s$gsd$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070528163335.GF5690@sygehus.dk>
> looking for something to review. And when posting a patch, try to make it
> easy for reviewers to tell that your patch is for their part of GCC.
I see your point. I originally thought I would be sending one patch for
whole gcc (as I have the complete patch ready), just broken into smaller
parts for reviewing. Therefore I called them "C++ compatibility". But I
will name the mails more according to the content in the future. (And
send pings with more reasonable names, too).
> A more traditional approach would be to use the patch tracker
> <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_Patch_Tracking>, just in case a
reviewer is
I tried this for a few patches, but I have some problems finding out
what area I should write there... But I will try to improve my patches.
Thanks for your suggestions.
Thomas