This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Volunteer for bug summaries?

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "FranÃois-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "GCC Development" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 17:26:07 -0700
Subject: Re: Volunteer for bug summaries?
References: <19c433eb0705220540o4a550aa7vabc7a9d6ded4059a@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000705220551r5c26668bg4f833512dd429c62@mail.gmail.com> <19c433eb0705220913s4fa5e4d0xc2fabbf0c769f415@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/22/07, FranÃois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gmail.com> wrote:

Take PR31095, for example. It's a 4.3 regression on x86 and x86_64
that is triggered on the GCC testsuite, it has been known for more
than 2 months, Janis kindly did a reghunt a month ago to attribute it,
the patch author was added in the CC list. Since then, nothing
happened.


I have a fix for this bug, as mentioned by me, it is unrelated to the
patch which caused it, I have no idea how the patch which exposed the
bug even exposed it really.  I guess I need to take this weekend to
fix regressions again :).

The fix by the way is an one liner too.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: Volunteer for bug summaries?
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: Volunteer for bug summaries?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Volunteer for bug summaries?
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]