This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: genautomata.c bug

From: "Aaron Gray" <angray at beeb dot net>
To: "Wei Chen" <smartchenwei at gmail dot com>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:46:07 +0100
Subject: Re: genautomata.c bug
References: <1ec701c794c0$1161eb10$0200a8c0@AMD2500> <06bd01c7961b$93b95ab0$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <405263d50705140440m1c61199dl2a54f32be79461ed@mail.gmail.com> <06c501c7962f$3fa20300$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <405263d50705140741k1dbfe66fuca1d57090197290f@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/14/07, Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com> wrote:
On 14 May 2007 12:40, Wei Chen wrote:
> help~~
> where is the statement?
At the line numbers Aaron mentioned of the latest rev of genautomata.c

> in whichi function?

gen_regexp_el

> i can't confirm them now!

Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00882.html
    cheers,
      DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
It's the same case in my GCC 3.4.5

I would not worry about it. It does no really effect genautomata only a few extra kbytes allocated.

Aaron

References:
- genautomata.c bug
  - From: Aaron Gray
- RE: genautomata.c bug
  - From: Dave Korn
- RE: genautomata.c bug
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: genautomata.c bug
  - From: Wei Chen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]