This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)

From: Bill Wendling <wendling at apple dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 20:10:27 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)
References: <4644E80E.1030905@codesourcery.com> <ED5F5818-B1BD-423D-A797-C1E2FB6F1FC0@apple.com> <de8d50360705120632r7268e4cod00f951e9fd94770@mail.gmail.com>

On May 12, 2007, at 6:32 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

On 5/11/07, Bill Wendling <wendling@apple.com> wrote:

This one was just filed against 4.2.0:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31903
It is causing LLVM (at least) to fail to build. Do you think it's
worth adding to the list?


You know the regression is not on the 4.2 branch and only the trunk.
I think Geoff applied the patch which caused the regression to your
local 4.2 tree.
So this is NOT a blocker for 4.2, only 4.3 when get around to fixing
those regressions.

Okay. Thanks, for checking on this! :-)

-bw

References:
- GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)
  - From: Bill Wendling
- Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]