This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)

From: prj at po dot cwru dot edu (Paul Jarc)
To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 02:42:22 -0400
Subject: Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)
References: <4644E80E.1030905@codesourcery.com> <m37ireacgf.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu> <20070512060806.GA5415@synopsys.com>

Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> wrote:
> I don't even think this qualifies as a bug.  It's basically an
> enhancement request, to have a clean way of supporting glibc in
> an unusual place.

It works in previous versions going back to 2.95.3, so I'd think it
would be a bug, and a regression.  But since this is such a rare
circumstance, I wouldn't expect it to be a release-blocker.  I brought
it up only in the hope that it might be transparent to someone and
fixed before the release, but I certainly understand if it isn't.

paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)
  - From: Paul Jarc
- Re: GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]