This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Information about LTO

From: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: "Sjodin, Jan" <Jan dot Sjodin at amd dot com>
Cc: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at acm dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 09:38:31 +0200
Subject: Re: Information about LTO
References: <7986CEFCE5C2954A88BEE2CAB6FAB374026FF4E6@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com> <571f6b510705011409l32fb6be4w6b5aeb152b50f461@mail.gmail.com> <7986CEFCE5C2954A88BEE2CAB6FAB374026FF4EA@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com>

On 5/2/07, Sjodin, Jan <Jan.Sjodin@amd.com> wrote:

Thanks for all the responses. It seems like LTO will have to wait for
the tuples or there will be a lot of throw-away code.


If you really only can think of LTO as the reader/writer, then perhaps
yes.  But if you read back this thread, you would have seen a bunch of
suggestions for how you can help with LTO prerequisites that do not
depend on tuples at all.  You should look at the bigger picture.

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Information about LTO
  - From: Sjodin, Jan
- Re: Information about LTO
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- RE: Information about LTO
  - From: Sjodin, Jan
- Re: Information about LTO
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- RE: Information about LTO
  - From: Sjodin, Jan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]