This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Information about LTO

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at acm dot org>
To: "Sjodin, Jan" <Jan dot Sjodin at amd dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 14:10:18 -0400
Subject: Re: Information about LTO
References: <7986CEFCE5C2954A88BEE2CAB6FAB374026FF4DC@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com> <m3mz0ojy10.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <7986CEFCE5C2954A88BEE2CAB6FAB374026FF4E0@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com>

Sjodin, Jan wrote on 05/01/07 13:54:

> Does LTO have any hard dependencies on the gimple-tuples? I imagine the
> on-disk representation could be separate from any internal
> representation. I am curious if the two efforts can be worked on in
> parallel and how well they can be separated, since the gimple-tuple
> project seems like a big effort also.

Some amount of parallelism may occur, but we will have to adapt many LTO
chunks when the tuple work goes in mainline.  The data structures for
the IL will be completely different, after all.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Information about LTO
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- Information about LTO
  - From: Sjodin, Jan
- Re: Information about LTO
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: Information about LTO
  - From: Sjodin, Jan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]