Re: Successfull Build of gcc on Cygwin WinXp SP2

["Aaron Gray" <angray at beeb dot net>]

> On 02 May 2007 02:47, Aaron Gray wrote:
>
> > James,
> >
> > > On 5/1/07, Aaron Gray wrote:
> > > > Hi James,
> > > >
> > > > > Successfully built latest gcc on Win XP SP2 with cvs built cygwin.
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering whether you could help to get me to the same point
> > > > please.
> >
> > > You will need to use Dave Korns patch for newlib.
> > >
> > > http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2007/msg00292.html
> >
> > I am getting the following :-
> >
> > $ patch newlib/libc/include/stdio.h 
> > fix-gcc-bootstrap-on-cygwin-patch.diff
> > patching file newlib/libc/include/stdio.h
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 475 (offset 78 lines).
> > Hunk #2 FAILED at 501.
> > Hunk #3 FAILED at 521.
> > 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > newlib/libc/include/stdio.h.rej
> >
> > Has a variation of the patch already been applied ? Shall I revert 
> > stdio.h
> > back to the CVS version ?
>
>  It is patched in newlib cvs, and then a second patch was applied on top 
> to
> fix a minor oversight, so if you're using cvs newlib, yes revert ("cvs 
> up -C")
> it.

As far as I know I am just using the newlib within winsup. So I presume I do 
not need to do this ?
Or do I need to patch manually ?

>  However the actual problem is probably that you need to manually patch 
> your
> *previously-installed* stdio.h in /usr/include.  The change won't filter 
> down
> to /usr/include until the next cygwin release.

So I just patch the /usr/inclue/stdio.h.

Aaron