This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: Builtin functions?

From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
To: "'Daniel Jacobowitz'" <drow at false dot org>, "'Paulo J. Matos'" <pocm at soton dot ac dot uk>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:51:17 +0100
Subject: RE: Builtin functions?
References: <11b141710704160904l28c17508v70c64255288293c8@mail.gmail.com> <20070416163032.GA12737@caradoc.them.org>

On 16 April 2007 17:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:04:05PM +0100, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
>> _ZStlsISt11char_traitsIcEERSt13basic_ostreamIcT_ES5_PKc
>> [operator<<]... SUCCESSFUL
> 
>> Well, this is definitely builtin but DECL_BUILT_IN == 0, which means
>> that when I do FOR_EACH_BB_FN, I'm getting a segmentation fault.
>> 
>> I wonder where my wrong assumption is. Any suggestions?
> 
> What do you mean, it's built in?  It comes from a source file, so
> almost by definition it isn't.


  Perhaps Paulo wants to know if the definition originated in a system header
file?


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Builtin functions?
  - From: 'Daniel Jacobowitz'

References:
- Builtin functions?
  - From: Paulo J. Matos
- Re: Builtin functions?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]