This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:03:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits
References: <20070412175356.GA14152@lucon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704121839010.6141@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20070412185253.GA14556@lucon.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704121854390.6141@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20070412190211.GB15450@lucon.org>

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, H. J. Lu wrote:

> Are there any documents/examples for a second variable for flag bits?

config/linux.opt uses Mask and InverseMask with Var.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: RFA: i386 is running out target mask bits
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]