This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex]
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'Thomas Neumann'" <tneumann at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:46:41 +0100
- Subject: RE: [RFA] C++ language compatibility in sources [was RE: Add missing casts in gengtype-lex]
- References: <evlhfu$bm2$1@sea.gmane.org> <014001c77d15$fa3e4a80$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <461E52A5.8080806@users.sourceforge.net>
On 12 April 2007 16:39, Thomas Neumann wrote:
>> However,
>> bundling them all up into big patches would probably run over the size
>> limit for "small patches that don't require paperwork". Do you have an
>> assignment on file with the FSF?
> no, and this is the reason why I send tiny patches. But I could try to
> fill the required paperwork (although I think I read it takes ages to be
> processed).
I've found the FSF clerk's office to be very alert and responsive; the thing
that people are usually complaining about when they say it's taken ages to get
the paperwork done is how long it's taken them to persuade a
paranoid/ass-covering[*] employer to agree a waiver. But I'm in the UK, and
I've received papers within a merre few of days of asking for them to be sent
out, and have received my confirmation in a similar timespan after replying
back, so please don't let the worry of that put you off.
cheers,
DaveK
[*] - delete as appropriate.
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....