This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions.

From: "J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza at gmail dot com>
To: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:22:39 +0200
Subject: Re: A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions.
References: <998d0e4a0704101029m562e8264yee69e957dca6c76d@mail.gmail.com> <m31wisp14r.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

10 Apr 2007 10:53:08 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:

As far as I can tell, you are recommending that gcc generate a
different code sequence than it currently does.  The most helpful
approach you can use for such a suggestion is to open a bug report
marked as an enhancement.  See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.

Postings to gcc@gcc.gnu.org are not wrong, but they will almost
certainly get lost.  An entry in the bug database will not get lost.

Thanks.

Ian

Thanks, bug reported as enhancement in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31531

References:
- A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions.
  - From: J.C. Pizarro
- Re: A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions.
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]