Re: Integer overflow in operator new

["J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza at gmail dot com>]

2007/4/9, Ross Smith <r-smith@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
> On Monday, 9 April 2007 13:09, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> >
> > This code is bigger than Joe Buck's.
> >
> > Joe Buck's code: 10 instructions
> > Ross Ridge's code: 16 instructions
> > Ross Smith's code: 16 instructions
>
> Well, yes, but it also doesn't have the bug Joe's code had. That was
> sort of the whole point. If you don't care whether it gives the right
> answer you might as well just leave the status quo.
>
> --
> Ross Smith ........ r-smith@ihug.co.nz ........ Auckland, New Zealand
>            "Those who can make you believe absurdities can
>            make you commit atrocities."        -- Voltaire

I'm sorry Ross Smith due to my bug.

In http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-04/msg00232.html appears

I'm sorry, the previous 3rd source code .c is an error mine.

Joe Buck's code: 10 instructions
Ross Ridge's code: 16 instructions
Ross Smith's code: 23 instructions   # <- rectified.

J.C. Pizarro