This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Integer overflow in operator new

From: Bradley Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
To: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Bradley Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2007 14:31:26 -0400
Subject: Re: Integer overflow in operator new

Robert Dewar wrote:

I have always been told that -ftrapv is nowhere near fully working or
reliable (I think Eric is the source of that advice).

Is this just a rumor, or are there data that backs this up. (That - fwrapv doesn't work, not that Dewar was always told that it doesn't work.)

Brad

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Integer overflow in operator new
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Integer overflow in operator new
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]