This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: error: "no newline at end of file"


"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:

| On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, gdr@cs.tamu.edu wrote:
| 
| > my understanding of pedwarn (since over a decade) is I explained.
| > Now, if we do have some good diagnostics, we should not lose them,
| > as a matter of restoring the traditional meaning of pedwarns.
| > Do you have an approximate list of those diagnostics?
| > 
| > > Nonetheless, if you really think it is a bug, I am willing to prepare
| > > a patch to fix it in both the front-end and the preprocessor.
| > 
| > If a pedwarn is an error without -pedantic, then we have a bug.
| 
| In C, a pedwarn is a warning by default, an error with -pedantic-errors.
| 
| In C++, a pedwarn is an error by default, a warning with -fpermissive.

You're describing a defect, not the intended semantics.

In C, a pedwarn is a warning by default, an error with -pedantic errors.

In C++, a pedwarn is a warning by default, an error with -pedantic.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]