This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: error: "no newline at end of file"

On 27/03/07, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> wrote: 
* Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@gmail.com> [2007-03-27 13:13]:
> So if you are seeing this in C++, the change was intentional because
> PR24924 was fixed. If you are seeing it in C and you are not using
> pedantic-errors, then it is probably a bug.

Thanks for the explanation - this explains what I'm seeing.  Is there
a good reason against changing this particular warning from
CPP_DL_PEDWARN to CPP_DL_WARNING?  Quite a few packages in Debian fail
to build because of this and it seems overly strict to me.  However, if
it'll remain an error with C++ code, I'll start filing bugs on these
packages.


I cannot answer why this is a pedwarn or why C++ emits pedantic errors
by default. I only made current behaviour more consistent and fixed an
open and confirmed bug (one less, 2700 to go).

Cheers,

Manuel.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]