This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?


On 3/22/07, Doug Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com> wrote:
The results, compile time:

For what test case?


For a bootstrapped, --disable-checking compiler:

8-bit tree code (baseline):

real    0m51.987s
user    0m41.283s
sys     0m0.420s

subcodes (this patch):

real    0m53.168s
user    0m41.297s
sys     0m0.432s

9-bit tree code (alternative):

real    0m56.409s
user    0m43.942s
sys     0m0.429s

Did the 9-bit tree code include Alexandre Oliva's latest bitfield optimization improvements patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01397.html)?

What about the 16-bit tree code?

Gr.
Steven


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]