This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: Using SSA

From: "Alexander Lamaison" <awl03 at doc dot ic dot ac dot uk>
To: <bonzini at gnu dot org>
Cc: "'GCC Development'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:37:53 -0000
Subject: RE: Using SSA
References: <00c201c76c1d$b4bc5000$1e34f000$@ic.ac.uk> <46023E2D.7030005@lu.unisi.ch> <00c801c76c75$5b48f570$11dae050$@ic.ac.uk> <4602697D.6020403@lu.unisi.ch>

> > I think (if I'm correctly interpreting the list in passes.c) it is.
> It's
> > right after pass_warn_function_noreturn, just before pass_mudflap_2.
> Is
> > this right?  I don't get any assertion about SSA not being available.
> 
> In this case, it is also after pass_del_ssa, which means SSA has
> already
> been destroyed.

Oh, ok. Thanks! I had assumed the mudflap passes would have SSA enabled as
the 'Tree-SSA passes' section of the GCC internal manual listed them:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Tree_002dSSA-passes.html#Tree_002dSSA-p
asses. 

Thanks.
Alex.

References:
- Using SSA
  - From: Alexander Lamaison
- Re: Using SSA
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- RE: Using SSA
  - From: Alexander Lamaison
- Re: Using SSA
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]